DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Interfaces for Supportive Ambient Intelligence Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These prior studies consider the autonomous generation of user interfaces but assume static behavior at run-time. Additionally, some of these systems focus only on particular aspects of user interfaces, for example, menus (Ressel et al, 2006), lists of items (Cantador et al, 2008) and message boxes (Abascal et al, 2008). Other studies analyze user interfaces in very limited application domains, such as multimedia control (Nichols et al, 2002), multimedia retrieval (Nichols et al, 2006), social information (Vazquez and López de Ipiña, 2008), and digital dossiers of artworks (Wang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These prior studies consider the autonomous generation of user interfaces but assume static behavior at run-time. Additionally, some of these systems focus only on particular aspects of user interfaces, for example, menus (Ressel et al, 2006), lists of items (Cantador et al, 2008) and message boxes (Abascal et al, 2008). Other studies analyze user interfaces in very limited application domains, such as multimedia control (Nichols et al, 2002), multimedia retrieval (Nichols et al, 2006), social information (Vazquez and López de Ipiña, 2008), and digital dossiers of artworks (Wang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, the user profile (as an expansion of FOAF ontology) includes the concept of cognitive characteristic; depending on the contextsensitive application to be developed, this concept should to be specialized, for example, by relating this concept to an OWL or RDF vocabulary that includes cognitive characteristics. Authors such as Abascal et al (2008) and Golemati et al (2006) have studied user cognitive characteristics that affect interaction with Ambient Intelligence services. These kinds of taxonomy can be easily integrated in our context model to enable a definition of adaptive behavior based on them.…”
Section: User Context and Visualization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further AmI-based interface is presented as adaptive interface [32] for complex AmI environments sharing resources (hardware, networks and knowledge); or providing a generation of user interfaces for Ambient Assisted Living services based on an interaction framework [33]. "World around us is interface to information" refers to AmI context [7].…”
Section: Overview Of the Existing Ami And Se Related Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of these environments (the availability of a variety of multimedia and interaction devices, sensors and appliances) is an essential issue in the development of context-adaptive applications. Additionally special needs of different target groups like supportive �r rehabilitative usage, non disruptiveness, invisibility, declining capabilities of users, low acceptance for technical problems and the involvement in the active everyday life [1,3] have to be considered carefully. Whi�e personalization puts a strong focus on the user as �e mam actor for any kind of system, context-of-use adaptatIon goes one step further and comprises adaptation to user, platform and environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%