2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction in coronary CT angiography using 320-row CT: Assessment of radiation dose reduction and image quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, measurements with the 320 row detector CT were performed with the MOSFET detectors on top of the phantom surface, whereas Hurwitz et al ., obtained measurements within the phantom and more closely simulated the anatomic position of the thyroid gland, thus resulting in less scatter and more dose absorption of interposed tissue and hence lower absorbed dose readings of the detectors. [20] However, thyroid dose absorptions are negligibly low in both studies, and the dose that is absorbed by the thyroid gland in association with CCTA can be safely considered as clinically inconsequential as the likelihood of cancer induction is close to zero based on BEIR VII data for patients between the ages of 50-70 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, measurements with the 320 row detector CT were performed with the MOSFET detectors on top of the phantom surface, whereas Hurwitz et al ., obtained measurements within the phantom and more closely simulated the anatomic position of the thyroid gland, thus resulting in less scatter and more dose absorption of interposed tissue and hence lower absorbed dose readings of the detectors. [20] However, thyroid dose absorptions are negligibly low in both studies, and the dose that is absorbed by the thyroid gland in association with CCTA can be safely considered as clinically inconsequential as the likelihood of cancer induction is close to zero based on BEIR VII data for patients between the ages of 50-70 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In three studies, the effective dose was (re)calculated using the DLP, because the effective dose was not provided or calculated with a different conversion factor. 16,18,20 The pooled routine effective dose using FBP was 4.2 (95% CI 3.5-5.0) mSv. At reduced dose level using IR, the pooled effective dose was 2.2 (95% CI 1.3-3.1) mSv (Figure 2).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Observational studies after implementation of ASIR have demonstrated 44-54 % reductions in effective dose [18, 34 • ]. AIDR has shown improved subjective and objective image quality with simulated 50 % dose reduction compared with full-dose FBP reconstructions of the same data [38], and one observational study demonstrated dose savings of 22 % without compromising quality [31]. Low-dose acquisitions using IRIS have demonstrated improved image quality compared with routine acquisitions using FBP with dose savings up to 62 % [27 • ].…”
Section: Noise and Radiation Dose Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%