2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0125946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive light-sheet fluorescence microscopy with a deformable mirror for video-rate volumetric imaging

Abstract: Light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) achieves optically sectioned imaging with the relatively low photobleaching and phototoxic effect. To achieve high-speed volumetric LSFM imaging without perturbing the sample, it is necessary to use some form of remote refocusing in the detection beam path. Previous work used electrically tunable lenses, tunable acoustic gradient index of refraction lenses, or the remote-refocusing approach of Botcherby et al. [Opt. Lett. 32(14), 2007 (2007)] to achieve remote refocus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the axial scan range of a DM is limited by the stroke length of the DM actuators. For example, for an objective with a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.8, the maximum axial scan range that DM-based techniques can generate is ∼100 μm 15,16 . Furthermore, using DM for focus control requires accurate alignment and complicated calibration of the DM to reduce the aberrations caused by imaging samples out of the nominal focal plane of the objective 9 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the axial scan range of a DM is limited by the stroke length of the DM actuators. For example, for an objective with a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.8, the maximum axial scan range that DM-based techniques can generate is ∼100 μm 15,16 . Furthermore, using DM for focus control requires accurate alignment and complicated calibration of the DM to reduce the aberrations caused by imaging samples out of the nominal focal plane of the objective 9 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the axial scan range of a DM is limited by the stroke length of the DM actuators. For example, for an objective with a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.8, the maximum axial scan range that DM-based techniques can generate is ~100 µm 15 , 16 . Furthermore, using DM for focus control requires accurate alignment and complicated calibration of the DM to reduce the aberrations caused by imaging samples out of the nominal focal plane of the objective 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LS illumination 2,7,14,15 , where the sample is illuminated with a thin sheet of light at the image plane, has emerged as a simple and effective method of reducing fluorescence background, phototoxicity, and photobleaching of fluorophores. Several LS approaches involving the use of separate objectives for illumination and detection have been designed for single-molecule imaging in cells, however, they suffer from optical complexity, low numerical aperture (NA) objectives, steric hindrance, the inability to optically section adherent cells, incompatibility with microfluidic systems, or drift between the objectives 14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] . Previous single-objective LS designs have been demonstrated to reduce the complexity and limitations of multi-objective systems, but they have been limited by beam thickness 28 , the need for beam scanning 29,30 , and limited effective NA in the detection path and the requirement for post-processing due to an illumination beam that is not aligned to the detection axis 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%