2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-016-9656-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Logic Characterizations of Input/Output Logic

Abstract: Abstract.We translate unconstrained and constrained input/output logics as introduced by Makinson and van der Torre to modal logics, using adaptive logics for the constrained case. The resulting reformulation has some additional benefits. First, we obtain a prooftheoretic (dynamic) characterization of input/output logics. Second, we demonstrate that our framework naturally gives rise to useful variants and allows to express important notions that go beyond the expressive means of input/output logics, such as v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have presented a bi-modal characterization of input/output logic in the context of selfextensional logics, a class of logics defined in terms of minimal properties, which are satisfied both by classical propositional logic and by the best known nonclassical logics. The present approach is different from other modal formulations of input/output logic [25,29,35], also on a non-classical propositional base, in that the output operators themselves are semantically characterized as (suitable restrictions of) modal operators, and their properties characterized in terms of modal axioms (inequalities).…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have presented a bi-modal characterization of input/output logic in the context of selfextensional logics, a class of logics defined in terms of minimal properties, which are satisfied both by classical propositional logic and by the best known nonclassical logics. The present approach is different from other modal formulations of input/output logic [25,29,35], also on a non-classical propositional base, in that the output operators themselves are semantically characterized as (suitable restrictions of) modal operators, and their properties characterized in terms of modal axioms (inequalities).…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It utilizes a correspondence between I/O and conditional logics. In [15] proof systems for constrained I/O logic are developed, where modalities for 'input' and 'output' allow for meta-reasoning in the object language. DAC uses labels instead of modalities and additionally allows for meta-reasoning about the (in)applicability of norms.…”
Section: Related Work and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second type of arguments concerns the nonmonotonicity of normative reasoning. The possibility to reason about the inapplicability of norms on the object language level distinguishes our work from other systems such as [14,15]. We illustrate the utility of our approach using the notion of related admissibility [16] to explain why some obligation holds despite certain norms to the contrary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, we presented a semantical characterization for constrained I/O logic. There are syntactical ( [41], Section 6) and proof theoretical ( [42], Section 3) characterizations for constrained I/O logic. Our semantical characterization is more flexible than the syntactical characterization since our approach does not necessarily depend on the rules AND, SI, and (EQI, EQO) required for syntactic characterization of the I/O operations in modal logic [42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%