2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive machine learning strategies for network calibration of IoT smart air quality monitoring devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuous learning, online learning, and adaptive learning are quite similar machine learning paradigms to incremental learning. De Vito et al [34] show that adaptive and incremental strategies, such as performing periodic recalibration, can improve the performance of initially trained calibration models for low-cost sensors. Through experiments carried out on measurements collected from 18-months electrochemical sensors deployments, monitoring CO, NO 2 , and O 3 concentrations, the authors demonstrate that such strategies improve the overall performance of calibration models and make them less sensitive to seasonal changes or other variations.…”
Section: Other Machine Learning Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous learning, online learning, and adaptive learning are quite similar machine learning paradigms to incremental learning. De Vito et al [34] show that adaptive and incremental strategies, such as performing periodic recalibration, can improve the performance of initially trained calibration models for low-cost sensors. Through experiments carried out on measurements collected from 18-months electrochemical sensors deployments, monitoring CO, NO 2 , and O 3 concentrations, the authors demonstrate that such strategies improve the overall performance of calibration models and make them less sensitive to seasonal changes or other variations.…”
Section: Other Machine Learning Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This brings issues of optimal training test split, both in terms of amount of data and also temporal position of the data. Similar issues are encountered in low cost sensor calibration [19,27]. Additionally, since we are dealing with time series analysis test data will always need to be temporally separated and have timestamp later in time compared to training data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Substantial algorithmic developments have been proposed in the last decade on the best ways to build those maps. These algorithmic developments slightly differ in ambition and scope, whether the eNoses are mounted in mobile platforms based on terrestrial or aerial robots [198]- [202], or by deploying chemical sensor networks over the area of interest [203]- [205]. The use of machine learning methods for sensor array calibration in this application scenario has been widely explored [206].…”
Section: C5) Chemical Mapping and Chemical Source Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%