2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive management for soil ecosystem services

Abstract: Ecosystem services provided by soil include regulation of the atmosphere and climate, primary (including agricultural) production, waste processing, decomposition, nutrient conservation, water purification, erosion control, medical resources, pest control, and disease mitigation. The simultaneous production of these multiple services arises from complex interactions among diverse aboveground and belowground communities across multiple scales. When a system is mismanaged, non-linear and persistent losses in eco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monitoring disturbance, invasive species, species richness, and so on are essential. In recent years, to adapt to environmental changes, adaptive management has become a hot issue and has been used to reduce uncertainty in ecosystem management via system monitoring (Birge et al ). In addition, as an ecological factor, fire, which disturbs ecosystems globally (Rocca et al ), appears many times in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring disturbance, invasive species, species richness, and so on are essential. In recent years, to adapt to environmental changes, adaptive management has become a hot issue and has been used to reduce uncertainty in ecosystem management via system monitoring (Birge et al ). In addition, as an ecological factor, fire, which disturbs ecosystems globally (Rocca et al ), appears many times in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and the trade‐offs in shifting management focus across scales (Birgé et al. ); (3) managing perturbations to remain within expected levels, while avoiding problematic feedbacks to the social and political components of protected areas and their surroundings; (4) learning how to work with, and balance, effective biodiversity conservation against the political and socioeconomic elements of protected areas (such as managing human–wildlife conflict, tourist demand for greater access to wilderness areas, poaching, and budgetary restrictions); and (5) managing and coping with spatial elements of resilience, such as habitat connectivity and exchanges with the surrounding landscape.…”
Section: Resilience and Sustainability Of Protected Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social‐ecological feedbacks and interactions vary with scale, as does the provision of ecosystem goods and services to and from SESs (Birgé et al. ). As scale (time and space) broadens, ecosystem controllability decreases; but the suite of ecosystem services available for management increases, creating a tension whereby increasing scale reduces the potential for management but increases the need for it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, however, the level of disturbance exceeds its resilience, the system will reorganize into an alternative state [18]. Often this reorganization results in significantly fewer and/or less desirable goods and services, which may be unanticipated by humans who depend upon those services to maintain quality of life standards [19]. The reorganization is also often marked by a loss of biodiversity and overall ecological integrity.…”
Section: Ecological Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 99%