1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Mesh and Algorithm Refinement Using Direct Simulation Monte Carlo

Abstract: Adaptive mesh and algorithm refinement (AMAR) embeds a particle method within a continuum method at the finest level of an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) hierarchy. The coupling between the particle region and the overlaying continuum grid is algorithmically equivalent to that between the fine and coarse levels of AMR. Direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) is used as the particle algorithm embedded within a Godunov-type compressible Navier-Stokes solver. Several examples are presented and compared with purely c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
228
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
228
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in that paper, particles that enter the particle patch have velocities drawn from the either the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution or the Chapman-Enskog distribution. While the Chapman-Enskog distribution is preferred in deterministic hybrids (see [4]) we find that in the stochastic hybrid the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution sometimes yields better results for the second moment statistics (see Sections 4.1 and 4.3). While Chapman-Enskog yields slightly more accurate results for time-dependent problems, where we focus on the mean behavior of the system (see Sections 4.4 and 4.5), one must recall that the derivation of the LLNS equations is based on the assumption of local equilibrium (e.g., gradients do not appear in the amplitudes of the stochastic fluxes).…”
Section: Hybrid Implementationmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As in that paper, particles that enter the particle patch have velocities drawn from the either the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution or the Chapman-Enskog distribution. While the Chapman-Enskog distribution is preferred in deterministic hybrids (see [4]) we find that in the stochastic hybrid the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution sometimes yields better results for the second moment statistics (see Sections 4.1 and 4.3). While Chapman-Enskog yields slightly more accurate results for time-dependent problems, where we focus on the mean behavior of the system (see Sections 4.4 and 4.5), one must recall that the derivation of the LLNS equations is based on the assumption of local equilibrium (e.g., gradients do not appear in the amplitudes of the stochastic fluxes).…”
Section: Hybrid Implementationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The implementation of reservoir boundary conditions for DSMC is described in [4]. As in that paper, particles that enter the particle patch have velocities drawn from the either the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution or the Chapman-Enskog distribution.…”
Section: Hybrid Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations