2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-017-0304-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive mesh point selection for the efficient solution of scalar IVPs

Abstract: We discuss adaptive mesh point selection for the solution of scalar IVPs. We consider a method that is optimal in the sense of the speed of convergence, and aim at minimizing the local errors. Although the speed of convergence cannot be improved by using the adaptive mesh points compared to the equidistant points, we show that the factor in the error expression can be significantly reduced. We obtain formulas specifying the gain achieved in terms of the number of discretization subintervals, as well as in term… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We shortly comment on comparison between the algorithm defined in [4] for scalar autonomous problems and the current algorithm designed for systems of IVPs, for the test problem (72). As it can be expected, the algorithm from [4] allows us to better treat small values of δ. This follows from the fact that, roughly speaking, the step size control in [4] was based on two-sided estimates of local errors.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We shortly comment on comparison between the algorithm defined in [4] for scalar autonomous problems and the current algorithm designed for systems of IVPs, for the test problem (72). As it can be expected, the algorithm from [4] allows us to better treat small values of δ. This follows from the fact that, roughly speaking, the step size control in [4] was based on two-sided estimates of local errors.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows from the fact that, roughly speaking, the step size control in [4] was based on two-sided estimates of local errors. Specific properties of scalar autonomous problems were used in [4]; they cannot be extended to systems of initial value problems. In order to handle systems of IVPs, the present algorithm uses upper local error bounds, see (28) and (29).…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A closer look however shows that advantages of adaption depend very much on the problem itself and the class of problem instances being solved. It is not a purpose of this paper to discuss the adaption/nonadaption issue in details -to have a flavor of it, one can consult the monograph [9], or recent papers [1], [5], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%