AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum 2021
DOI: 10.2514/6.2021-0747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Mesh Refinement for a Sharp Immersed Boundary Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When used with IBM combination, the main drawback of patch/block‐based AMR is near immersed boundary refinement, as a single patch/block covering the immersed boundary is not computationally efficient. Many small patches/blocks must be used to cover the immersed boundary, as in previous research 11 and the difficulty arises for treating mirror image point belonging to sharp interface IBM during grid change near immersed boundary 18 . The treatments of an immersed boundary containing patches/blocks and other fluid cells containing patches/blocks are slightly different; small patch/block‐based AMR–IBM combination is more expensive than cell‐based AMR methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used with IBM combination, the main drawback of patch/block‐based AMR is near immersed boundary refinement, as a single patch/block covering the immersed boundary is not computationally efficient. Many small patches/blocks must be used to cover the immersed boundary, as in previous research 11 and the difficulty arises for treating mirror image point belonging to sharp interface IBM during grid change near immersed boundary 18 . The treatments of an immersed boundary containing patches/blocks and other fluid cells containing patches/blocks are slightly different; small patch/block‐based AMR–IBM combination is more expensive than cell‐based AMR methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%