2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for deburring stage classification and prediction for indirect quality monitoring

Abstract: Manufacturing of aerospace components consists of combination of different types of machining, finishing, and measuring processes. One of the finishing processes is deburring, i.e. a finishing process to remove burrs from work coupons after a boring hole process. Deburring is conducted to achieve required surface finish quality prior to further processes in assembly line. This paper introduces sensor data analysis as a tool to quantify and correlate the deburring stage with the features extracted from sensors … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented solutions, methods, and approaches can be improved and used in the future. Moreover, mechanical engineering is essential for fault diagnosis of machines [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and the analysis of temperature [23][24][25]. The mechanical properties of materials are also investigated in the literature [26][27][28].…”
Section: The Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented solutions, methods, and approaches can be improved and used in the future. Moreover, mechanical engineering is essential for fault diagnosis of machines [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and the analysis of temperature [23][24][25]. The mechanical properties of materials are also investigated in the literature [26][27][28].…”
Section: The Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where FS-A1, FS-A2, FS-A3, FS-A4-denoted 4 frequency spectra of state A, FS-B1, FS-B2, FS-B3, FS-B4-denoted 4 frequency spectra of state B, FS-C1, FS-C2, FS-C3, FS-C4-denoted 4 frequency spectra of state C, FS-D1, FS-D2, FS-D3, FS-D4-denoted 4 frequency spectra of state D, FS-E1, FS-E2, FS-E3, FS-E4-denoted 4 frequency spectra of state E. Next, 40 differences between frequency spectra are computed: The MSAF-15-MULTIEXPANDED-8-GROUPS found 28 essential frequency components: 48,50,79,81,97,101,128,157,159,1469,1471,1672,1926,1927,1934,1935,1939,1942,1953,1957,1958,1961,1978,2038,2039,2042 Found essential frequency components were classified by the NN classifier [35,36], NM classifier, SOM [37], BNN [38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. There was possibility to use another classifier such as naive Bayes, support vector machine [45][46][47], linear discriminant analysis [48], fuzzy classifiers [49,50], and fuzzy c-means clustering [51].…”
Section: Components (Fs-a1 Fs-b1 Fs-c1 Fs-d1 Fs-e1) (Fs-a2 Fs-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It keeps changing on demand, which follows the nonlinear and time-varying properties of the given problem. PANFIS is also capable of crafting a classical-transparent fuzzy rule from a high-dimensional ellipsoidal rule through fuzzy rule transformation (14). An example of PANFIS's rule is exemplified in variance prediction:…”
Section: Time-series Mode Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fuzzy rule is rather vague and is unable to be associated directly with linguistic labels because of the absence of atomic clauses. This issue can be addressed using the fuzzy set transformation strategy (14) and this leads to the traditional expression of the fuzzy rule as follows: R 1 :If Variance n−1 is close to c 11 = 0.29, σ 11 = 0.11 and Skewness n−2 is close to c 12 = 0.292, σ 12 = 0.11 Then y = 0.03 + 0.17variance n−1 + 0.04variance n−2 (21) This rule is more readable than (20) because each fuzzy set corresponds to a specific linguistic label. This fuzzy rule is generated under the time-series mode prediction.…”
Section: Time-series Mode Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation