2006 Seventh Mexican International Conference on Computer Science 2006
DOI: 10.1109/enc.2006.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Node Refinement Collocation Method for Partial Differential Equations

Abstract: In this work, by using the local node refinement technique purposed in [1,2], and a quad-tree type algorithm [3,4]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying the proposed adaptive algorithm resulted in N=1281 nodes and RMS=6.936e-5 after three steps of adaptation, while Libre et al [25] Achieved lower accuracy using a wavelet scheme with N=1823 nodes and after four steps of adaptation. Munoz-Gomez et al [23] Achieved this accuracy after 12 iterations and with 2646 points The numerical results with uniform and adaptive distributions are shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Applying the proposed adaptive algorithm resulted in N=1281 nodes and RMS=6.936e-5 after three steps of adaptation, while Libre et al [25] Achieved lower accuracy using a wavelet scheme with N=1823 nodes and after four steps of adaptation. Munoz-Gomez et al [23] Achieved this accuracy after 12 iterations and with 2646 points The numerical results with uniform and adaptive distributions are shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The error indicator was used to identify locations that require higher accuracy and Behrens et al [22] applied this algorithm to linear evolutionary PDEs and obtained accurate results. Gomez et al [23] presented a RBF dynamic domain decomposition algorithm. This algorithm was applied in a large PDEs with high gradient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be accom plished in two ways: by means of the clas si cal Carte sian h-re fine ment scheme or an adap tive node re finement scheme (ANR). We se lect the sec ond ap proach be cause it has been showed to be com pu ta tional ef ficient (Muñoz-Gómez et al, 2006;Driscoll et al, 2006).…”
Section: Expe Ri Mental Error Analysis For Implicit Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, RBF-specific preconditioners [18] and adaptive selection of data centres [19]. However, the only reliable method currently available is domain decomposition [19], [20], [21], [22], [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%