2011
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive noise cancellation to suppress electrocardiography artifacts during real‐time interventional MRI

Abstract: Purpose: To develop a system for artifact suppression in electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings obtained during interventional real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods:We characterized ECG artifacts due to radiofrequency pulses and gradient switching during MRI in terms of frequency content. A combination of analog filters and digital least mean squares adaptive filters were used to filter the ECG during in vivo experiments and the results were compared with those obtained with simple low-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivated by the disturbance of the ECG inside the magnetic field, different methods were developed to enable a more reliable ECG triggering. These were based on adaptive noise cancellation , independent component analysis approaches and cross‐correlation to identify the QRS complex in real time . However, the use of electrophysiological signals is susceptible to distortions and alternative methods have been proposed for cardiac triggering such as self‐gating and acoustic triggering .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the disturbance of the ECG inside the magnetic field, different methods were developed to enable a more reliable ECG triggering. These were based on adaptive noise cancellation , independent component analysis approaches and cross‐correlation to identify the QRS complex in real time . However, the use of electrophysiological signals is susceptible to distortions and alternative methods have been proposed for cardiac triggering such as self‐gating and acoustic triggering .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conductivity was 0. 27 for Phantom1, whereas for Phantom2, conductivity was 0.72 .The inter-electrode distance was 5 cm. Each phantom was positioned vertically at (Table I) An electrocardiogram signal simulator (MPS450 Patient Simulator, Fluke Biomedical) was used to generate the EPS, which were injected into the gelatin phantom via the transmission system.…”
Section: A Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECG systems with extended bandwidth, used for both monitoring and identification of cardiac arrhythmias during real-time interventional MRI are of current research interest [27]. A relatively narrow ECG bandwidth 0.5-30 Hz is required for monitoring, while a higher quality ECG in the 0.05-100 Hz range is required for diagnosis in order to detect pathologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, standard ASA monitoring equipment is also less reliable in this setting. Because many of our monitors utilize electrical measurement to produce clinically applicable information, these can be corrupted by interference from magneto‐hydrodynamic effects and radiofrequency pulses when brought near the electromagnetic field . Although newer equipment implements technology that makes monitoring less challenging by reducing these artifacts, aberrations are not completely eliminated.…”
Section: Mri Is Not Without Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because many of our monitors utilize electrical measurement to produce clinically applicable information, these can be corrupted by interference from magneto-hydrodynamic effects and radiofrequency pulses when brought near the electromagnetic field. [16][17][18][19] Although newer equipment implements technology that makes monitoring less challenging by reducing these artifacts, aberrations are not completely eliminated. If, and when, an emergency is recognized in the MRI scanner, management of these crises is more complicated than for those that occur outside of the radiology suite.…”
Section: Mr I Is Not With Out Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%