2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2013.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive non-local means filter for image deblocking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table VII, the compared methods are as follows: (1) VRCNN (S) [18] which is a baseline CNN-based compressed-video post-processing method; (2) QECNN-P [20] which is a compressed-video post-processing method for P frames in HEVC; (3) DRN [21], which is another state-ofthe-art compressed-video post-processing method. (4) VR-CNN+MM+AF (S ), which integrates our partition-awarebased approach into the existing baseline VRCNN method; (5) DRN+MM+AF, which integrates our partition-awarebased approach into the existing DRN method; (6) Our 2-in+MM+AF (D ), which is the full version of our partitionaware-based approach with local mean-based mask and addbased fusion; (7) Our ASN@4D , which is the adaptiveswitching scheme with the deep CNN model. From the table, we can observe that: Table VII also shows that our methods can achieve the same or better performance on color channels (U, V) even though training was done on the luminance channel (Y).…”
Section: Results Of Our Adaptive-switching Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table VII, the compared methods are as follows: (1) VRCNN (S) [18] which is a baseline CNN-based compressed-video post-processing method; (2) QECNN-P [20] which is a compressed-video post-processing method for P frames in HEVC; (3) DRN [21], which is another state-ofthe-art compressed-video post-processing method. (4) VR-CNN+MM+AF (S ), which integrates our partition-awarebased approach into the existing baseline VRCNN method; (5) DRN+MM+AF, which integrates our partition-awarebased approach into the existing DRN method; (6) Our 2-in+MM+AF (D ), which is the full version of our partitionaware-based approach with local mean-based mask and addbased fusion; (7) Our ASN@4D , which is the adaptiveswitching scheme with the deep CNN model. From the table, we can observe that: Table VII also shows that our methods can achieve the same or better performance on color channels (U, V) even though training was done on the luminance channel (Y).…”
Section: Results Of Our Adaptive-switching Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the first group belong methods based on traditional image processing techniques working both in the spatial and in the frequency domain. For spatial domain processing different kinds of filters have been proposed, with the intent of restoring specific areas of the images such as edges [3], textures [4], smooth regions [5], etc. Algorithms usually rely on information obtained by the application of the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) transform [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison on QFs not seen during training. For ARCNN and MWCNN the models trained for QF=10 and QF=20 are tested on QF in the range[5,25]. The proposed model is trained for QF in the range[10, 100] with steps of 10, and is tested on the same intermediate QFs not seen in training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it turns out that the same machinery can be used for pixel level operations, as well. For example, ConvNets have shown better performance than traditional methods for image restoration tasks such as deblocking [24] and restoration [25].…”
Section: B Convnet For Quality Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%