Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3447928.3456643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive parameter tuning for reachability analysis of nonlinear systems

Abstract: Reachability analysis fails to produce tight reachable sets if certain algorithm parameters are poorly tuned, such as the time step size or the accuracy of the set representation. The tuning is especially difficult in the context of nonlinear systems where over-approximation errors accumulate over time due to the so-called wrapping effect, often requiring expert knowledge. In order to widen the applicability of reachability analysis for practitioners, we propose the first adaptive parameter tuning approach for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precision is relatively stable and does not necessarily improve when decreasing the time step. Indeed, as already noted [25], the improvement in approximation by Taylor models on smaller time steps is balanced by the loss of precision due to set-based abstraction being performed more often. Note also that the analysis time does not depend linearly on the time step: the control step, which rules the frequency at which the analysis of the neural net controller has to be performed, is fixed (see Table 1) and does not depend on the integration time step.…”
Section: Choice Of Tools and Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The precision is relatively stable and does not necessarily improve when decreasing the time step. Indeed, as already noted [25], the improvement in approximation by Taylor models on smaller time steps is balanced by the loss of precision due to set-based abstraction being performed more often. Note also that the analysis time does not depend linearly on the time step: the control step, which rules the frequency at which the analysis of the neural net controller has to be performed, is fixed (see Table 1) and does not depend on the integration time step.…”
Section: Choice Of Tools and Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Since the settings for reachability analysis can be tuned automatically [60], [61], the main design parameters for our safety shield in addition to the type of control law discussed in Sec. V-A are the planning horizon t f and the replanning time t c .…”
Section: E Parameter Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, two types of approaches exist: The majority of methods computes an over-approximation that is as tight as possible for a desired (lower) user-specified order. The alternative approach in [30,Thm. 3.2] reduces the or-der as much as possible for a given bound of the induced over-approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method [45] proposes iterative recomputations of the reachable set from scratch, while refining the parameter values in discrete steps in between runs. The work in [30] presents the first fully automatic reachability algorithm for nonlinear systems, which not only optimizes the time step size, but also other algorithm parameters such as the representation size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%