2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.g004231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Pose Tracking Control for Spacecraft Proximity Operations Under Motion Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interest has been largely demonstrated by commercial servicing programs proposed by both private companies like Infinite Orbits or Astroscale with the ELSA-D mission [1], as well as by public agencies (e.g. NASA's Restore-L mission [2]), in close proximity to an RSO which is cooperative and providing information on its state, despite being uncontrolled [15][16][17][18]. In [19], the target is assumed to be uncontrolled and uncooperative (at least actively), therefore its state is estimated through the knowledge of some fiducial markers on the docking interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interest has been largely demonstrated by commercial servicing programs proposed by both private companies like Infinite Orbits or Astroscale with the ELSA-D mission [1], as well as by public agencies (e.g. NASA's Restore-L mission [2]), in close proximity to an RSO which is cooperative and providing information on its state, despite being uncontrolled [15][16][17][18]. In [19], the target is assumed to be uncontrolled and uncooperative (at least actively), therefore its state is estimated through the knowledge of some fiducial markers on the docking interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shen et al [10] extended this result by considering additional angular-velocity limits. Some other constrained feedback controllers for six-degreeof-freedom problems were given in [15], [16]. However, APbased controllers lack essential optimizing abilities and cannot make the trade-off between control cost and performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A time-varying sliding mode-based fault-tolerant controller was designed in [27], but the proposed model was the same as the traditional tracking model for one spacecraft so that the model couplings between the target and chaser in rendezvous and docking missions were ignored. To describe the relative pose motion between two spacecraft in a unified way, the dual quaternion-based relative pose motion model was reported recently, and some corresponding controllers were also designed, such as the non-certainty-equivalence adaptive controller in [28], output feedback controllers in [29] and [30], proportional-derivative controller in [31], and adaptive sliding mode controller in [32]. The aforementioned state feedback control approaches are able to achieve the prescribed relative pose control objectives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%