2021
DOI: 10.1002/acs.3228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive preview control with deck motion compensation for autonomous carrier landing of an aircraft

Abstract: In this article, an autonomous carrier landing problem of an aircraft is addressed by developing an autonomous carrier landing system (ACLS) composed of previewable guidance and control systems. In the guidance system, an appropriate touchdown point is estimated by predicting the seakeeping motion of the deck by unscented Kalman filtering technique, which is then utilized to adjust the reference glide path and produce an effective deck motion compensation, indispensable for a safe landing. The adaptive preview… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The automatic carrier landing system (ACLS) comprises the aircraft flight control system, approach power compensator system, inertial navigation sensors, and precision tracking radar, enabling automated approach control to the carrier deck in all weather conditions. Various intelligent control methods, such as adaptive sliding mode control [3], backstepping and sliding mode [4], adaptive preview control [5], fixed-time backstepping control [6], and inverse optimal control [7], are employed in the ACLS to track the desired glide path during the landing process precisely. Furthermore, the ACLS incorporates adaptive backstepping sliding mode control to mitigate the impact of carrier air-wake turbulence during the landing process [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automatic carrier landing system (ACLS) comprises the aircraft flight control system, approach power compensator system, inertial navigation sensors, and precision tracking radar, enabling automated approach control to the carrier deck in all weather conditions. Various intelligent control methods, such as adaptive sliding mode control [3], backstepping and sliding mode [4], adaptive preview control [5], fixed-time backstepping control [6], and inverse optimal control [7], are employed in the ACLS to track the desired glide path during the landing process precisely. Furthermore, the ACLS incorporates adaptive backstepping sliding mode control to mitigate the impact of carrier air-wake turbulence during the landing process [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early landing control technology was mainly based on classical control [9][10][11], but that could not give CBA favourable landing performance in a complex landing environment. Therefore, scholars have provided many methods for improvement based on modern control theory, such as fixed-time control [12,13], dynamic inversion control [14], fuzzy control [15,16], predictive control [17,18], sliding-mode control [19,20], backstepping control [21] and adaptive control [22,23]. However, all the aforementioned studies were based on the hypothesis that CBA remains in their normal states without any faults, whereas in reality, they are susceptible to combat damage and actuator faults due to complex flight environments and large variations in dynamic pressure in operational missions, leading to serious degradation of system performance and posing direct threats to landing safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e main functions of aircraft sortie generation should include operating, maintaining, and supporting the takeoff and landing of aircraft concurrently [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%