1968
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051250203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive problems and possibilities in the temporal fenestration of tetrapod skulls

Abstract: Adaptive explanations for the temporal fenestration in reptiles are briefly reviewed. With few possible exceptions, fenestrate appeared first in the reptiles, and have seemingly evolved independently in several different phyletic lines.The several explanations for fenestration offered by previous authors include speculations that open spaces in the skull permitted bulging of the jaw-closing muscles, and that fenestrae formed in areas of reduced stress where the presence of bone would be functionally useless. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The skull provides a structure for jaw and neck muscle attachment and should be rigid enough to withstand the forces these muscles apply, along with accompanying feeding and other forces [6][8]. Exactly how the skull responds to these forces in tandem with accommodating the brain and sense organs is not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skull provides a structure for jaw and neck muscle attachment and should be rigid enough to withstand the forces these muscles apply, along with accompanying feeding and other forces [6][8]. Exactly how the skull responds to these forces in tandem with accommodating the brain and sense organs is not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence or absence of the lower temporal arch, which ventrally bounds the lower temporal fossa and is formed by a contact between jugal and quadratojugal, was usually treated as very important by systematists in the past (Frazzetta 1968;Rieppel and Gronowski 1981). The loss of the arch was formerly regarded as unique for squamates and, therefore, many early diapsids, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive allometries of the bones of the lower adductor chamber of B. elegans , therefore, may reflect greater resistance for a more robust musculature of m. adductor mandibulae internus and m. adductor mandibulae posterior in response to higher forces created by external adductors. Besides, these muscles also play the main role in feeding, as proposed for aquatic feeders (Frazzetta, 1968; Werneburg, 2012), in addition to a larger area between the two tips of the maxilla (i.e., SMX a  = 0.70) and a flattened skull.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…9B), which originate at the quadrate, prootic, pterygoid, palatine, postorbital and the descending process of the parietal (Schumacher, 1973; Werneburg, 2011), are important during the jaw-closure phase. The importance of these muscles has been debated for early tetrapods with flat skull and aquatic lifestyle (e.g., Temnospondyli and Lepospondyli; Frazzetta, 1968), in which the internal muscle might have assumed the main function of closing the jaw (Werneburg, 2012). This also occurs in turtles with flat skulls and with poorly developed crista supraoccipitalis (e.g., Chelidae; Werneburg, 2011; Werneburg, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%