Proceedings of 14th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference EPE-PEMC 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1109/epepemc.2010.5606627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive PWM control scheme of interleaved boost converter for AC traction application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further analysis has to be done on simultaneous multiple faults. [51,92,93,95,96] phase-shift adjustment interleaved converters yes no not applicable [99,100] bypass of faulty module input series output parallel no yes (1 per module) low [94,98] bypass of faulty module MMCs no no low [101] bypass of faulty module cascaded DC-DC converters no yes (atleast 5) high [106] inclusion of redundant components dual-switch buck converters no yes (1 per module) low [104,105] inclusion of redundant components series-resonant DC-DC converter no yes (4 per module) medium [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103] inclusion of redundant components full bridge converters yes yes (3 per module) medium [44] inclusion of redundant components non-isolated multilevel converter yes yes (1 per module) low [39] inclusion of redundant components PSFB converter yes yes (2 per module) low [40,43] inclusion…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further analysis has to be done on simultaneous multiple faults. [51,92,93,95,96] phase-shift adjustment interleaved converters yes no not applicable [99,100] bypass of faulty module input series output parallel no yes (1 per module) low [94,98] bypass of faulty module MMCs no no low [101] bypass of faulty module cascaded DC-DC converters no yes (atleast 5) high [106] inclusion of redundant components dual-switch buck converters no yes (1 per module) low [104,105] inclusion of redundant components series-resonant DC-DC converter no yes (4 per module) medium [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103] inclusion of redundant components full bridge converters yes yes (3 per module) medium [44] inclusion of redundant components non-isolated multilevel converter yes yes (1 per module) low [39] inclusion of redundant components PSFB converter yes yes (2 per module) low [40,43] inclusion…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase shift adjustment, a reconstructed scheme which is normally employed in converter topologies that apply a phase shift modulation method. Accordingly, phase shift adjustment contributes very good results on parallel‐connected SAB converters [50], input parallel output‐series (IPOS) converters [94], and interleaved DC–DC converters [48, 51, 95–98]. The major merits of the phase shift adjustment fault‐tolerant strategy are Low implementation cost. Effectiveness and simplicity. …”
Section: Fault‐tolerant Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase-shift adjustment is a reconfiguration measure commonly adopted in converter topologies that employ a phase-shift modulation strategy. Therefore, phase-shift adjustment provides fairly good results not only on multiphase converters, also known as interleaved DC-DC converters [17,19,[38][39][40][41] , but also on parallel-connected SAB DC-DC converters [18] or input-parallel output-series (IPOS) converters [42] .…”
Section: Phase-shift Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%