2019
DOI: 10.3837/tiis.2019.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Queue Management Based On the Change Trend of Queue Size

Abstract: Most active queue management algorithms manage network congestion based on the size of the queue but ignore the network environment which makes queue size change. It seriously affects the response speed of the algorithm. In this paper, a new AQM algorithm named CT-AQM (Change Trend-Adaptive Queue Management) is proposed. CT-AQM predicts the change trend of queue size in the soon future based on the change rate of queue size and the network environment, and optimizes its dropping function. Simulation results in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the aggressive dropping method used in AQMRD results in low link utilization, lengthy delays, and a high loss rate. Change Trend Queue-Management (CT-AQM) is a novel AQM algorithm that Tang and Tan designed so as to increase the reaction time of RED scheme (Tang, L. & Tan, Y., 2019). In order to determine packet drop probabilities, CT-AQM forecasts the change trend of queue size based on the change rate of the traffic load and average queue length (avg).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the aggressive dropping method used in AQMRD results in low link utilization, lengthy delays, and a high loss rate. Change Trend Queue-Management (CT-AQM) is a novel AQM algorithm that Tang and Tan designed so as to increase the reaction time of RED scheme (Tang, L. & Tan, Y., 2019). In order to determine packet drop probabilities, CT-AQM forecasts the change trend of queue size based on the change rate of the traffic load and average queue length (avg).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor performance of the RED algorithm can be related with its linear drop function, that tends to be extremely aggressive when traffic load is low and not aggressive enough at high loads (Bonald, T., et al, 2015 andKorolkova, A., et al, 2019). To address the weakness of RED, several improved variants of RED were developed, such as Gentle RED (Floyd S., 2000), Adaptive RED (Floyd, S., et al, 2001), Double Slope RED (Zheng, B., 2006), Nonlinear RED (Zhou, K., et al, 2006) Autonomous RED (Ho, H. J., & Lin, W. M., 2008), Cautious Adaptive (Tahiliani, M. P., et al, 2011), Improved Nonlinear RED (Zhang et al, 2012, Three Section RED (Feng, C., et al, 2014), Adaptive queue management with random dropping (Karmeshu et al, 2017), Change Trend Queue Management (Tang, L. & Tan, Y., 2019), Quadratic RED (Kumhar, D., et al, 2021), Quadratic Exponential RED (Hassan, S., et al, 2023), etc. Despite all of these improvements, whenever there is changes in the traffic load, the impact of congestion control will be significantly impacted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%