2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Radiation Therapy Physician Guidelines: Recommendations From an Expert Users’ Panel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our study focused on the technical aspects of safely commissioning adaptive radiotherapy, clinics should also give careful consideration to procedures and guidelines for contouring and evaluating adaptive plans. A recent paper by Kim et al provides some guidance from physicians for ART prescriptions and on-treatment decision-making, 30 whereas a publication by Shepherd et al details an approach to train-ing advanced adapters and implementing an adaptive workflow. 31 A limitation of this work is that this series of tests is non-exhaustive and could be expanded to include other scenarios that clinics may encounter with online adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our study focused on the technical aspects of safely commissioning adaptive radiotherapy, clinics should also give careful consideration to procedures and guidelines for contouring and evaluating adaptive plans. A recent paper by Kim et al provides some guidance from physicians for ART prescriptions and on-treatment decision-making, 30 whereas a publication by Shepherd et al details an approach to train-ing advanced adapters and implementing an adaptive workflow. 31 A limitation of this work is that this series of tests is non-exhaustive and could be expanded to include other scenarios that clinics may encounter with online adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent paper by Kim et al. provides some guidance from physicians for ART prescriptions and on‐treatment decision‐making, 30 whereas a publication by Shepherd et al. details an approach to training advanced adapters and implementing an adaptive workflow 31 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, our institution holds a monthly adaptive working group meeting where involved members present and refine novel workflow and trial concepts, enabling stream-lined team teaching and group involvement in the development of new disease site applications. When “doctor-of-the-day” style coverage is utilized for daily ART procedural coverage, communication of clinical intent between team members is also essential; we utilize a well-described adaptive guideline approach, in which a detailed written hand-off guides the covering physician to meet the prescribing physician’s clinical goals for individual ART patients [48] . Reassessment of clinical use following major technologic upgrades is also critical for evolution of ART use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 10 years, three adaptive radiation therapy (ART) platforms—Ethos (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), MRIdian (ViewRay Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA), and Unity (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden)—have been introduced for clinical application. These platforms utilize onboard imaging-based deformable auto-segmentation of structure sets [ 28 ]. However, the accuracy of deformable image registration (DIR) depends on factors like the interface areas of deformation, the transformation framework (asymmetric or symmetric), the registration algorithm, and the mapping direction (forward or backward) [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, manual adjustments might be necessary for these outcomes, potentially consuming a significant amount of time. Additionally, the implementation of online ART carries the risk of unintended modifications to the treatment plan, thereby increasing the demand for radiation oncologists to evaluate and approve plans in real-time [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%