2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.108865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive range-based localization algorithm based on trilateration and reference node selection for outdoor wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [9], reference [10], reference [11], and reference [12] as the comparison method of the methods in the text, based on the Formula (31) to calculate the five methods in different target distances, for the target tracking error results, the test results are shown in Table V. After analyzing the test results in Table V, it is concluded that under different target distances, five methods are used for target tracking, and the maximum tracking errors of reference [9], reference [10], reference [11], and reference [12] are 0.277m, 0.224m, 0.219m, and 0.255m respectively; The maximum tracking error is 0.142m after target tracking by the method. Hence, this method has a better target tracking effect, because the method in this paper builds a target tracking model based on the sensor node position after accurate positioning, so it can improve the target tracking accuracy.…”
Section: After Analyzing the Test Results In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reference [9], reference [10], reference [11], and reference [12] as the comparison method of the methods in the text, based on the Formula (31) to calculate the five methods in different target distances, for the target tracking error results, the test results are shown in Table V. After analyzing the test results in Table V, it is concluded that under different target distances, five methods are used for target tracking, and the maximum tracking errors of reference [9], reference [10], reference [11], and reference [12] are 0.277m, 0.224m, 0.219m, and 0.255m respectively; The maximum tracking error is 0.142m after target tracking by the method. Hence, this method has a better target tracking effect, because the method in this paper builds a target tracking model based on the sensor node position after accurate positioning, so it can improve the target tracking accuracy.…”
Section: After Analyzing the Test Results In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In study [9], an adaptive distance-based localization (ARBL) algorithm based on the trilateral measurement and reference node selection is studied. The algorithm locates nodes according to the evaluation results of node geometry, to improve the positioning accuracy of sensor nodes and provide a basis for target tracking; If the evaluation of node geometry is not accurate enough or has errors, it will lead to the inaccuracy of node positioning results obtained by this method, thus affecting the effect of target tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [ 23 , 24 , 19 , 15 , 11 ] that the adaptive algorithms strongly depend on the information stored at training phase (at the offline phase, where by the required pre-information are recorded). This adds memory and power requirements in order to attain accurate position estimation [ 4 , 17 , 14 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single antennas are used to identify the presence of an individual in the area (e.g. Motus; Taylor et al, 2017), while arrays of receivers can be used to estimate location based on the relationship between recorded radio signal strength (RSS, measured in decibels) and distance from each receiver (Luomala & Hakala, 2022). The distances around receivers are radii whose overlapping circumferences may be calculated through triangulation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%