2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11045-017-0494-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive resource management algorithm for target tracking in radar network based on low probability of intercept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be pointed out that the predefined target detection constraint β SINR is set to be −2.5 dB, which is approximately equivalent to the values of β MI = 0.466 nats for a desired target parameter estimation performance (Romero et al, ; Shi et al, ). In order to solve the problems of LPI‐based jamming waveform design Problem 1 and Problem 2 , it is also assumed that the precise knowledge of the target spectra, the PSDs of the signal‐dependent clutters, and the radar‐transmitted waveforms are perfectly estimated by the smart jammer (Shi, Zhou, & Wang, ; L. L. Wang et al, ).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be pointed out that the predefined target detection constraint β SINR is set to be −2.5 dB, which is approximately equivalent to the values of β MI = 0.466 nats for a desired target parameter estimation performance (Romero et al, ; Shi et al, ). In order to solve the problems of LPI‐based jamming waveform design Problem 1 and Problem 2 , it is also assumed that the precise knowledge of the target spectra, the PSDs of the signal‐dependent clutters, and the radar‐transmitted waveforms are perfectly estimated by the smart jammer (Shi, Zhou, & Wang, ; L. L. Wang et al, ).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the total transmitted jamming power of the uniform jamming waveform in both criteria is also presented in Figure , where the uniform jamming waveform design methods are considered as the corresponding benchmarks. As introduced in Shi, Zhou, and Wang () and L. L. Wang et al (), the uniform jamming waveform spreads the barrage noise jamming power averagely in the whole frequency band without any prior information about the target, clutter, and radar‐transmitted waveforms. As predicted in previous sections, for the same SINR/MI threshold value, the LPI performance improvement is quite apparent compared with the uniform jamming waveform design schemes which are usually adopted in traditional barrage noise jamming because of not employing the prior knowledge.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the mean period of simultaneous overlaps of two window junctions is expressed as TM=TIτInormalΔTTnormald,i1τI+1Tnormald,i, where Δ T is the revisit interval. Hence, the spatial‐time‐frequency intercept probability that an intercept occurs during the time T d, i can be obtained as follows (Shi et al, ; Yan et al, ): pstf=1K0exp()Tnormald,iTM, where K0=1TIτInormalΔTTnormald,i=1 since τ I ≪ T I and T d, i ≪Δ T .…”
Section: Jtsrm Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ΔT is the revisit interval. Hence, the spatial-time-frequency intercept probability that an intercept occurs during the time T d,i can be obtained as follows (Shi et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2016):…”
Section: 1029/2018rs006584mentioning
confidence: 99%