Adaptive Reuse and Sustainability Protocols in Italy: Relationship with Circular Economy

Abstract

This paper explores the enhancement of adaptive reuse (AR) of buildings through the lens of the sustainability protocols within the context of circular economy (CE) in Italy. Cities and the built environment can play a key role in the transition to a CE, especially considering the documented negative global impact due to resource consumption and waste generation. This is recognised among the principles of circularity defined by the European Commission towards a general strategy for a sustainable built environment, which encourages initiatives of building reuse and land consumption reduction. It has been proven that the AR of vacant buildings can bring environmental, social, and economic benefits towards an urban strategy based on CE principles by generating useful values to support innovative development dynamics. In this perspective, the sustainability protocols can be identified as useful tools to pursue strategies for spreading the culture of sustainable build environment. Considering the huge vacant Italian architectural heritage, this paper aims to analyze how the most widely used sustainability protocols in the Italian context currently address the enhancement of the reuse of buildings, to improve environmental, social, and economic quality in the built environment. We discuss the results highlighting how and which sustainability protocols better intercept these issues, providing grounds for future development.

Using Marginal Land Resources to Solve the Shortage of Rural Entrepreneurial Land in China

“…In the case of South Korea, we found that an idle factory was creatively transformed into a cafe with cultural value and experience value; as an independent tourist attraction, it promotes the sustainable development of the local economy and also provides us with a new idea for the utilisation of idle factories and similar buildings [85][86][87]. Italy has taken measures to reduce the need for soil sealing by reactivating abandoned or unused buildings, sites, and areas [105]. Numerous studies have shown that the adverse effects of past industrialisation can be offset by improving and integrating the reuse of abandoned areas and buildings [106,107].…”

Urban buildings sustainable adaptive reuse into tourism accommodation establishments: a SOAR analysis

“…Although adaptive reuse can sometimes generate controversy due to the nuanced distinctions among renovation, façadism, and other closely related architectural and construction practices [4], it is generally seen as a suitable compromise between (historic) preservation and demolition [5,6]. After all, such projects address the three pillars of sustainable development, namely the environment, economy, and society, well-serving the principles of the circular economy model [7,8].…”

The Role of Built Heritage for Sustainable Development Goals: From Statement to Action

“…Zero Hunger-Through the rehabilitation and a general attention to heritage fruition, it is possible to limit the consumption of lands and their subtraction to cultivation and primary activities. The link between reuse, new construction and land consumption has been explored by [34][35][36].…”