Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2003. ISCAS '03.
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2003.1206113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive scheme for Internet video transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8A. The design of a system that can switch the video transmission from non-scalable coding to FGS scalability is presented in [4] by using neural network technology. A potential extension of this neural network-switching scheme to other single layer and scalable layer coding can be implemented as future work.…”
Section: Comparison Of Adaptive Switching Of Pfgs Streams With Simulcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8A. The design of a system that can switch the video transmission from non-scalable coding to FGS scalability is presented in [4] by using neural network technology. A potential extension of this neural network-switching scheme to other single layer and scalable layer coding can be implemented as future work.…”
Section: Comparison Of Adaptive Switching Of Pfgs Streams With Simulcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is no flexibility to scale down the bit rate/video quality of a stream during network transport, unless typically computationally demanding transcoding is performed at intermediate network nodes. Bitstream switching can also be applied over versions of different coding schemes, but an increase in the computational complexity of video decoding is inevitable [2][3][4]. Scalable (layered) video coding overcomes these drawbacks by encoding a video into a base layer and several enhancement layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 and, hence, the coding scheme can be alternated between single layer coding and FGS coding schemes. Additional details of designing this neural network can be found in [35].…”
Section: Network Performance Comparison Between Single Layer and Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the need to encode an impractically large number of versions (on the order of several tens of versions are required to adapt a Mbps video at the granularity of 100 kbps) and no flexibility to scale down the bit rate/video quality of a stream during network transport, unless typically complex and computationally demanding transcoding is performed at intermediate network nodes. Bitstream switching can also be applied over versions of different coding schemes, but an increase in the computational complexity of video decoding is inevitable [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%