2017 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/sose.2017.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Service-Oriented Architectures for Cyber Physical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other works providing service oriented architectures (SOAs) focused on adaptation but neglected user-based personalization. E.g., Feljan et al [8] defined a SOA for planning and execution (SOA-PE) in Cyber Physical Systems (CPS), and Mohalik et al [22] proposed a MAPE-K autonomic computing framework to manage adaptivity in service-based CPS. Morais et al [23] present RAH, a RA for IoT-based e-Health apps.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works providing service oriented architectures (SOAs) focused on adaptation but neglected user-based personalization. E.g., Feljan et al [8] defined a SOA for planning and execution (SOA-PE) in Cyber Physical Systems (CPS), and Mohalik et al [22] proposed a MAPE-K autonomic computing framework to manage adaptivity in service-based CPS. Morais et al [23] present RAH, a RA for IoT-based e-Health apps.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trade-off of the majority of service mashups approaches in the literature is that applications rely on static mashups that cannot deal with open environments. Service-oriented architectures for planning, execution and adaptation of cyber-physical systems (CPS) have been proposed in [23,24]. The approach proposed in [23] is based on a clean separation between domain modeling, planning, execution, monitoring and actuation services enabling the realization of large scale CPSs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach proposed in [23] is based on a clean separation between domain modeling, planning, execution, monitoring and actuation services enabling the realization of large scale CPSs. In [24], the authors propose a MAPE-K autonomic computing framework to manage adaptivity in service-based CPSs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of cloud service adaptation are described in [48,80]. As surveyed in [52] In earlier work [6,43,44] we proposed the notion of an autonomic middleware for IoT-based systems. The key aspect of this middleware is the use of MAPE-K concepts to facilitate context-aware adaptation of IoT service compositions.…”
Section: Resource Management and Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current adaptation techniques and implementations are only for specific systems. We recommend to exploit end-to-end context-aware adaptation [43,44] based on issues triggered from the IoT side as the ensembles are mainly for addressing problems from the IoT side with also resources in the edge and cloud. Considering a huge number of uncertainty across layers and systems as well as the vast knowledge that one needs to master to work with ensembles, we recommend to develop uncertainty measure for ensembles.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%