2014 15th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/sta.2014.7086759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive sliding-mode control of nonholonomic wheeled mobile robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were unrealistic for a WMR with elevated loads and speeds [7]. This imposes significant limitations to the applicability of purely kinematic system [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The results were unrealistic for a WMR with elevated loads and speeds [7]. This imposes significant limitations to the applicability of purely kinematic system [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Interaction forces on the x-axis and y-axis can be expressed in terms of Equations (35) and (36), as…”
Section: Interaction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical dynamic equation for mobile robots can be expressed, according to [ 35 ], as where, M is the symmetric inertial matrix, V is the centripetal and Coriolis matrix, E is the interaction matrix between surface and robot including friction effects, G is the gravitational vector, is the robot’s spatial orientation vector defined as , is the vector of bounded unknown disturbances including unmodeled dynamics, B is the input matrix, is the input vector, A is the matrix associated with kinematic constraints, is the vector of Lagrange multipliers, q is the generalized coordinates defined as q = .…”
Section: Dynamic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control law of the right wheel torque and left wheel torque for the mobile robot platform depends on the x-y position errors and the orientation error as in Eqs. (11) and (12), respectively.…”
Section: ) (K Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These control algorithms have been proposed to solve the mobile robot motion control to follow the desired path with high performance of the controller in terms of generating an optimal control DOI: https://doi.org/10.33103/uot.ijccce.18.2.1 action that leads to minimizing the tracking pose error during tracking the desired path. These algorithms include the nonlinear neural PID controller [6], fuzzy logic and PID controllers [7], neural networks controllers [8 and 9], adaptive fuzzy with back-stepping controllers [10], adaptive sliding mode controllers [11], neural predictive controllers [12], [13], and nonlinear fractional order PID neural controllers [14], [15]. The motivation for this research is to find the best path with obstacles avoidance and to track and stabilize the mobile robot on the desired path by generating the best action without undesirable states such as a saturation state and a spike action state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%