Advances in GPU Research and Practice 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803738-6.00014-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive sparse matrix representation for efficient matrix-vector multiplication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This option fits some parts of the CI sparse matrix that are easy to recreate. It's worth mentioning that CPUs are faster than the GPUs when calculating the elements on the fly since CPUs have more complex chips than GPUs [14]. GPUs do branch prediction in a slower fashion than CPUs.…”
Section: The Proposed Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This option fits some parts of the CI sparse matrix that are easy to recreate. It's worth mentioning that CPUs are faster than the GPUs when calculating the elements on the fly since CPUs have more complex chips than GPUs [14]. GPUs do branch prediction in a slower fashion than CPUs.…”
Section: The Proposed Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a model based on the GPU's native instruction set, it predicts the performance within 5%-15% error range for blocked ELLPACK format. Zardoshti et al [24] developed an adaptive run-time approach to identify the best format among four basic formats. It executes a small portion of the input matrix and tune it with GPU architectural parameters and chooses the best performing matrix based on the portion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%