2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2010.04218
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive spectral density estimation by model selection under local differential privacy

Martin Kroll

Abstract: We study spectral density estimation under local differential privacy. Anonymization is achieved through truncation followed by Laplace perturbation. We select our estimator from a set of candidate estimators by a penalized contrast criterion. This estimator is shown to attain nearly the same rate of convergence as the best estimator from the candidate set. A key ingredient of the proof are recent results on concentration of quadratic forms in terms of sub-exponential random variables obtained in [GSS19]. We i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in our context, with the presence of local differential privacy constraints, it seems natural to leverage the minimization of a contrast function technique, incorporating this quantity into the definition of the privacy mechanism employed in our estimation procedure. Furthermore, introducing centered Laplace-distributed noise to bounded random variables is known to ensure α-differential privacy (see [2], [20], [31]). This motivates our choice of the anonymization procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even in our context, with the presence of local differential privacy constraints, it seems natural to leverage the minimization of a contrast function technique, incorporating this quantity into the definition of the privacy mechanism employed in our estimation procedure. Furthermore, introducing centered Laplace-distributed noise to bounded random variables is known to ensure α-differential privacy (see [2], [20], [31]). This motivates our choice of the anonymization procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent advancements in research have introduced mechanisms that extend to a broader array of statistical challenges. These encompass hypothesis testing [8,33], M-estimators [6], robustness [35], change point analysis [9], mean and median estimation [20], and nonparametric estimation [12,11,31], among others. With the escalating importance of data protection, striking the right balance between statistical utility and privacy becomes crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%