IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2011.6161154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive subspace-based prediction of T1DM glycemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section presents the ARX model proposed in this paper. Differently to the black box models found in the literature (for instances [28,30,26,24]), the proposed ARX model uses EE, IOB, and COB as inputs to improve IG prediction. These inputs allow to consider 1) the intensity and duration of a PA, 2) the delivered insulin which is modulated (before and during PA) to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia, and 3) the CHO, usually ingested before and during PA to prevent hypoglycemia.…”
Section: The Proposed Arx Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section presents the ARX model proposed in this paper. Differently to the black box models found in the literature (for instances [28,30,26,24]), the proposed ARX model uses EE, IOB, and COB as inputs to improve IG prediction. These inputs allow to consider 1) the intensity and duration of a PA, 2) the delivered insulin which is modulated (before and during PA) to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia, and 3) the CHO, usually ingested before and during PA to prevent hypoglycemia.…”
Section: The Proposed Arx Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System identification is an alternative solution already used for considering the effect of PA in IG prediction. For instance, in [24], a subspace-based patient-specific model is proposed for IG prediction on T1D patients during 30 min of exercise. The model receives CHO, insulin, HR, and respiration rate as inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous approaches have been taken in the diabetes technology literature to propose glucose predictive models, the majority being based on polynomial and state-space models. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Thanks to the increased availability of real-life data collected for long-period trials, machine learning (ML) techniques have become increasingly popular and have been successfully employed to solve the BG prediction problem. In particular, early prior studies exploited random forest, multivariate adaptive regression splines, 11 k-nearest neighbor, 12 decision tree, 13 gradient-boosted regression tree, 14 and support vector regression (SVR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These predictors are based on different methods and data; purely empirical [14], derived from physiological models [9] or a combination thereof [7], [10], and designed for, and validated on different usage scenarios. Selecting among the different predictors a priori is a challenging task, and considering the complex dynamics of plasma glucose metabolism, there is good reason to believe that different predictors may be experts in specific conditions, and that no single model will be able to fully capture the dynamics alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%