2018
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2018.2827042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Supersampling of Rays for Accurate Calculation of Physical Optics Scattering From Parametric Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the fins and cylinder form a concave corner similar to a dihedral, multiple reflections have to be considered to improve the accuracy. For grazing incidence of impinging rays, adaptive supersampling has been used 19 . The monostatic RCS of the object is calculated by the authors' codes (labeled as MATLAB‐PO) and compared with the results of PO solver of CST in Figure 4.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As the fins and cylinder form a concave corner similar to a dihedral, multiple reflections have to be considered to improve the accuracy. For grazing incidence of impinging rays, adaptive supersampling has been used 19 . The monostatic RCS of the object is calculated by the authors' codes (labeled as MATLAB‐PO) and compared with the results of PO solver of CST in Figure 4.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 For higher-order reflections inside the object segments, the ray-surface resolution mismatch affects the accuracy of determining S i . 19 The presence of r 0 and b n r 0 ð Þ in Equation (2) also complicates the numerical calculation of the physical optics integral. When NURBS surfaces are used to accurately describe the object, these challenges have to be carefully addressed.…”
Section: Nurbs Representation Of a Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations