1997
DOI: 10.1109/78.575687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive tracking of linear time-variant systems by extended RLS algorithms

Abstract: In this paper, we exploit the one-to-one correspondences between the recursive least-squares (RLS) and Kalman variables to formulate extended forms of the RLS algorithm. Two particular forms of the extended RLS algorithm are considered: one pertaining to a system identification problem and the other pertaining to the tracking of a chirped sinusoid in additive noise. For both of these applications, experiments are presented that demonstrate the tracking superiority of the extended RLS algorithms compared with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RLS algorithm, which can be viewed as the deterministic counterpart of the Kalman filter theory, uses all of the information contained in the input data by introducing the forgetting factor λ into the design of the recursive algorithm [Haykin (2002)]. Compared to the LMS filter, the RLS filter exhibits an order of magnitude faster rate of convergence, but the LMS filter might display better tracking behavior than the RLS filter, which is model dependent, while the LMS algorithm is model independent [Haykin et al (1997);Haykin (2002)]. The Kalman filter theory [Kalman (1960)] uses the state-space approach for the describing of dynamical systems, and offers a solution to a class of recursive minimum mean-square estimation problems [Brown and Hwang (1997); Haykin (2002)].…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RLS algorithm, which can be viewed as the deterministic counterpart of the Kalman filter theory, uses all of the information contained in the input data by introducing the forgetting factor λ into the design of the recursive algorithm [Haykin (2002)]. Compared to the LMS filter, the RLS filter exhibits an order of magnitude faster rate of convergence, but the LMS filter might display better tracking behavior than the RLS filter, which is model dependent, while the LMS algorithm is model independent [Haykin et al (1997);Haykin (2002)]. The Kalman filter theory [Kalman (1960)] uses the state-space approach for the describing of dynamical systems, and offers a solution to a class of recursive minimum mean-square estimation problems [Brown and Hwang (1997); Haykin (2002)].…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the studies reported in the literature, it is known that the very simple least mean-square (LMS) recursive filtering method can exhibit a better tracking behavior than the RLS method [Haykin et al (1997)] because the LMS algorithm is model independent, while the RLS algorithm is model dependent [Sayed and Kailath (1994); Haykin (2002)]. According to this fact, an adaptive OT algorithm, based on the recursive LMS method, which, so far, is not being used as OT tools, is implemented here, together with the RLS OT filter [Bai et al (2002); Wu et al (2009)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in fast fading channels, an averaging period equal to the coherence time of the channel is insufficient to overcome the effects of additive noise and characterize the multiuser interference (MUI) [1]. Furthermore, the use of optimized convergence parameters such as step sizes and forgetting factors into conventional adaptive algorithms extend their fading range and lead to improved convergence and tracking performance [8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, the stability of adaptive step-sizes and forgetting factors can be a concern unless they are constrained to lie within a predefined region [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In matrix generalization of the momentum LMS (MLMS) algorithm case of a time-varying model, adaptive algorithms like LMS try to [14]. track the time variation of the system impulse response, as analyzed in [4,5,6]. However, this tracking is done on a sample-by-sample 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%