2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive variational mode decomposition method for signal processing based on mode characteristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [36] presented the permutation entropy optimization method to determine the mode number K of VMD. Lian et al [37] proposed a neoteric method termed as adaptive variational mode decomposition, which can choose the mode number K of VMD based on the characteristic of the mode components. However, all parameter selection criteria presented in the above ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang et al [36] presented the permutation entropy optimization method to determine the mode number K of VMD. Lian et al [37] proposed a neoteric method termed as adaptive variational mode decomposition, which can choose the mode number K of VMD based on the characteristic of the mode components. However, all parameter selection criteria presented in the above ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all parameter selection criteria presented in the above ref. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] ignored the influence of the penalty factorα on the decomposition ability. Thus, on this basis, Shan et al [38] applied the minimization criterion of the root mean square error (RMSE) to adaptively search for two VMD parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome the critical drawback, some studies have been conducted. Lian et al [17] chose M according to a series of indicators including permutation entropy, extreme value in the frequency domain, kurtosis criterion, and energy loss coefficient. Liu et al [18] estimated M by using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [18] estimated M by using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance. e above two methods in [17,18] both optimized the value of M but neglected the influence of α on decomposition results. Based on the grasshopper optimization algorithm, Zhang et al [19] proposed a method to obtain the optimum of M and α. Wang et al [20] used multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) to obtain the optimum of M and α, in which the symbol dynamic entropy and the power spectral entropy were selected as the objective function of MOPSO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows better noise robustness, and can effectively separate two pure harmonic signals with similar frequencies. However, when the VMD method decomposes the signal, the decomposition effect is seriously affected by the number of decomposition components [56][57][58][59][60]. Some other methods have been proposed to realize signal analysis and fault diagnosis in recent years [61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%