2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2004.10.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptively weighted sub-pattern PCA for face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
65
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For using as much local information hidden in face images as possible to relax the influence of local variation for recognition, recently various local region matching techniques have been developed [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The general idea of local region matching techniques is to first locate several facial features (components), and then classify the faces by comparing and combining the corresponding local statistics [11].…”
Section: Eigenface Is An Unsupervised Methods Which Utilizes the Idea mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For using as much local information hidden in face images as possible to relax the influence of local variation for recognition, recently various local region matching techniques have been developed [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The general idea of local region matching techniques is to first locate several facial features (components), and then classify the faces by comparing and combining the corresponding local statistics [11].…”
Section: Eigenface Is An Unsupervised Methods Which Utilizes the Idea mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zou et al [11] have verified that comparison of corresponding local regions is better than comparing corresponding facial components. So, in this paper, we adopt the simplest rectangular regions to partition images, which not only are conveniently used but also can better preserve the spatial and geometrical information in the original images [4][5][6].…”
Section: Local Region Partitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[30] * 4.67 -Stringface [4] 13.00 -PWCMr [14] -16.00 LGBPHS [36] 16.00 -SOM [29] 25 - * used only a subset of occlusions Partial Dist. [30] 0.00 3.00 7.00 12.00 14.00 37.00 12.00 Aw-SpPCA [28] 0.00 2.00 12.00 12.00 10.00 36.00 12.00 SOM [29] 0.00 2.00 12.00 12.00 10.00 36.00 12.00 SubsetModel [22] 3.00 10.00 17.00 26.00 23.00 25.00 17.00…”
Section: A Ar-face Occlusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to state-of-the-art methods the proposed extensions achieve significantly better recognition results. This is interesting since all of competitive approches except for already mentioned Partial Distance [30] method use a significantly larger amount of training data in order to learn a representative subspace via Gaussian mixtures [22] and self-organising maps [28,30] which can not compete with the performance of the presented warping algorithms, but are probably more efficient.…”
Section: B Ar-face Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%