1985
DOI: 10.1016/0168-0072(85)90020-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addendum to “countable algebra and set existence axioms”

Abstract: 2016-12-26T14:59:35

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the reverse mathematician is constrained to use full induction as sparingly as possible" [Simpson, 1985, p. 150]. It is additionally observed in both [Friedman et al, 1983] and [Simpson, 1985] that the systems with restricted induction are more amenable to ordinal analysis, that their firstorder parts of systems with restricted induction typically admit neater characterizations, and that while the use of restricted induction sometimes results in more complicated proofs, not only are few reversals to classical theorems lost in this manner, but their proofs sometimes yields improved quantifiers bounds.…”
Section: Rca 0 As a Formal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the reverse mathematician is constrained to use full induction as sparingly as possible" [Simpson, 1985, p. 150]. It is additionally observed in both [Friedman et al, 1983] and [Simpson, 1985] that the systems with restricted induction are more amenable to ordinal analysis, that their firstorder parts of systems with restricted induction typically admit neater characterizations, and that while the use of restricted induction sometimes results in more complicated proofs, not only are few reversals to classical theorems lost in this manner, but their proofs sometimes yields improved quantifiers bounds.…”
Section: Rca 0 As a Formal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But although his original formulation of the basic subsystems in [Friedman, 1975] was based on full first-order induction, no explanation for restricting induction is given in [Friedman, 1976]. This topic is, however, discussed at length in [Friedman et al, 1983] wherein RCA 0 appears to have first been formulated in its contemporary form. One programmatic observation made there is that full induction is provably equivalent to the bounded comprehension scheme ∀x∃X(y ∈ X ↔ (y < x ∧ φ(y))) over RCA 0 .…”
Section: Rca 0 As a Formal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing study has been carried out in the context of subsystems of second order arithmetic, under the slogan Reverse Mathematics [12,3,23]. We continue this program here by examining the role of strong set existence axioms in separable Banach space theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Bounded König's Lemma, T f has a path. Here we are using the fact that Bounded König's Lemma is provable in WKL 0 (see [12] and Lemma IV.1.4 of [23]). Since T f ⊆ T , it follows that T has a path.…”
Section: Be the Upward Closure Of T Under Majorization Then T Is Welmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation