2020 5th International Conference on Robotics and Automation Engineering (ICRAE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icrae50850.2020.9310881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding Active Damping to Energy-Efficient Electro-Hydraulic Systems for Robotic Manipulators — Comparing Pressure and Acceleration Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such study was validated experimentally by several research groups on different machines. [15][16][17] Cheng et al 18 compare the two strategies investigating their effectiveness through the motion of a robotic manipulator. The pressure feedback induces a higher overshoot, and an increased settling time can be observed during the motion of the actuator, as Padovani 16 also confirms.…”
Section: Active Damping On Front Loadersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such study was validated experimentally by several research groups on different machines. [15][16][17] Cheng et al 18 compare the two strategies investigating their effectiveness through the motion of a robotic manipulator. The pressure feedback induces a higher overshoot, and an increased settling time can be observed during the motion of the actuator, as Padovani 16 also confirms.…”
Section: Active Damping On Front Loadersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Cheng et al 18 compare the two strategies investigating their effectiveness through the motion of a robotic manipulator. The pressure feedback induces a higher overshoot, and an increased settling time can be observed during the motion of the actuator, as Padovani 16 also confirms. This is justified by the fact that the pressure feedback methodology introduces additional dynamics.…”
Section: Active Damping On Front Loadersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electro-hydraulic drives of the boom, arm, and bucket require a PI-controller acting on the position error, feedforward command based on the desired actuator velocity, and pressure feedback to add artificial damping (a detailed description is given in reference [23]). The latter characteristic is essential because the energy-efficient nature of these drives dictates extremely low damping ratios otherwise [27]. Lastly, the swing's fully electric drive uses the same control structure except for the lack of pressure feedback.…”
Section: Reference Working Cycle and Automated Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electro-hydraulic drives (boom, arm, and bucket) use the same control structure with the addition of artificial damping obtained via pressure feedback. The latter feature is key because the drives' energy-efficient nature dictates extremely low damping ratio for their version [26]. Therefore, tracking of the commanded actuator position (xSet) is obtained by generating a suitable speed command for the electric motor (figure 7).…”
Section: Working Cycle and Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%