Adding an international lens to the university striving model: How both global and national indicators influence the Chinese higher education hierarchy

Abstract

Institutions that are most attuned to university rankings are known as “strivers.” These striving universities chase prestige by altering policies to match league table indicators, while also benchmarking against elite universities within the domestic hierarchy. However, this model has mostly been ascribed to studies in the United States and it has not been considered in non-Western contexts. Through interviews with 48 academics and administrators from Chinese universities, the research explores striving behaviors in China and expands the US-centric model to include global competition with international rankings. The findings show that striving universities in China have placed considerable emphasis on international rankings, but distinctions from the central government have still dominated competition within the domestic hierarchy. Pressures from the various rankings must be balanced between the local and global. These new considerations offer a global outlook on the domestic university striving model.

A Systematic Literature Review of Higher Education Reputation Management: Active/Reactive Framework

“…Therefore, to better attract stakeholders’ support and resources, including potential growing student numbers, public and private funding, RM has grown in importance in HE. Furthermore, M. Allen (2021) denoted that given the various circumstances of universities, such as national and institutional contexts, how they respond to the benchmark criterion is even more complex. Also, the studies in non-western contexts are rarely conducted compared with studies in western backgrounds (Allen, 2021).…”

“…Furthermore, M. Allen (2021) denoted that given the various circumstances of universities, such as national and institutional contexts, how they respond to the benchmark criterion is even more complex. Also, the studies in non-western contexts are rarely conducted compared with studies in western backgrounds (Allen, 2021). Consequently, it not only implies the importance of studying the influence of RM, but also how it manifests in non-western countries, in this case, China.…”