Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model

McFarland, Daniel J.; Hamilton, Douglas A.

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.009

Cited by 218 publications

(145 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

127

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This suggests that; User experience has a significant influence on users' attitude towards the system. This is consistent with previous research findings (Taylor & Todd, 1995;Agarwal & Prasad, 1999;Fusilier & Durlabhji, 2005;Lee, Qu & Kim, 2007) which contends previous exposure to a system, or relative system, is likely to have a positive influence on the constructs measured in the TAM, particularly in relation to PU (Chang et al, 2005), albeit at times, indirectly through increased user self-efficacy (McFarland & Hamilton, 2006).…”

Section: (1) User Experience -Fig 5asupporting

confidence: 81%

“…As a model for user information system adoption, the TAM has now been tested and extended by a large number of researchers for over twenty years (Adams et al, 1992;Agarwal & Jayesh, 1999;Brown et al, 2002;Burton-Jones & Hubona, 2006;Chau, 1996;Dishaw & Strong, 1998;Lederer et al, 1998;Liaw & Huang, 2003;Mathieson, 1991;McFarland & Hamilton, 2006;Moon & Kim, 2001;Shih, 2004;Taylor & Todd, 1995;Teo, Lim & Lai, 1999;Venkatesh & Davis, 2000). In that time, the model has acquired various evolving states (Lee, Kozar & Larsen, 2003) being protracted and validated -to varying degrees -with a variety of other constructs as a way of both; (1) reckoning whether PU and PEoU tell the entire story of user technology adoption; and (2) to determine if other constructs might act as antecedents to PU and PEoU.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Individual constructs have been used to extend TAM in the twenty years since Davis (1986Davis ( , 1989 first proposed the model, including; user experience (Adams et al, 1992;Taylor & Todd, 1995;Gefen, 2003); subjective norm (Taylor & Todd, 1995); motivation Yi et al, 2006); self-efficacy (Chau, 2001;McFarland & Hamilton, 2006); perceived playfulness (Moon & Kim, 2001;; computer attitude (Chau, 2001); computer enjoyment Teo et al, 1999;Liaw & Huang, 2003;van der Heijden, 2004); computer efficacy (Chau, 2001;McFarland & Hamilton, 2006); computer anxiety (Hackbarth, Grover & Yi, 2003;Schottenbauer et al, 2004); system quality ; perceived performance (Shih 2004); system usage (McFarland & Hamilton, 2006); IT continuance usage (Bhattacherjee, 2001;Limayem et al, 2003); habitual behaviour (Gefen, Karahanna & Straub, 2003;Limayem et al, 2003) and trust . As well, individual differences, such as; age (Liu et al, 2000;Arning & Ziefle, 2007); gender (Gefen & Straub, 1997;Agarwal & Prasad, 1999;Venkatesh & Morris, 2000;Venkatesh et al, 2004); level of education (Chuang & Chuang, 2002;Burton-Jones & Hubona, 2005); cognitive style (Rapp, Taylor & Crane, 2003); and cognitive absorption (Agarwal & Karahanna 2000;Saadé & Bahli, 2005) have been used to look for variables in user results to PU &...…”

Section: Introducing Poi: Perception Of Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Preliminary Introduction to the OTAM: Exploring Users’ Perceptions of their on-going Interaction with Adopted Technologies

Knight

Burn

2011

AJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A common criticism directed at Davis ' (1986; 1989) Technology Acceptance Model relates to its failure to adequately frame the "experienced" user's ongoing adoption and exploitation of information technologies. Given the pervasive nature of technology into individual users' ongoing, everyday communication and information interactions, along with the "new adopter" becoming an increasingly rare entity, the TAM is in danger of becoming a somewhat obsolete framework for investigating user-technology interaction. Presented is critical analysis of the development and current state of the TAM, followed by a proposed addition to the existing Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEoU) TAM constructs. The paper contends that the inclusion of a third broad construct, Perception of Interaction (PoI) allows researchers to develop an investigative framework which facilitates an exploration of users' ongoing and changing perceptions of the such things as the predictability of their technology interaction processes. The paper represents one the few inductive TAM investigations.

show abstract

Section: (1) User Experience -Fig 5asupporting

confidence: 81%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introducing Poi: Perception Of Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Preliminary Introduction to the OTAM: Exploring Users’ Perceptions of their on-going Interaction with Adopted Technologies

Knight

Burn

2011

AJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Generally, the model explains between 30% and 40% of system usage (Burton-Jones & Hubona, 2006;Legris, Ingham, & Collerette, 2003). In addition, perceived usefulness is often found to be the strongest determinant in the model (BurtonJones & Hubona, 2006;King & He, 2006;Legris et al, 2003;McFarland & Hamilton, 2006).…”

Section: There Are Two Central Determinants In Tammentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept

Godoe¹,

Johansen²

2012

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies have indicated that service quality is closely related to perceived usability. For example, McFarland and Hamilton (2006) showed that service quality is associated with system usage. Park and del Pobil (2013) also found that perceived system…”

Section: Service Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The adoption of teaching assistant robots: a technology acceptance model approach

Park

Kwon

2016

PROG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.*Related content and download information correct at time of download. Purpose -Based on rapid improvements in telecommunications and wireless networks with extensive educational contents, numerous studies have been conducted to improve our educational success/attainment/environment. With this trend, the purpose of this paper is to investigate users' perceptions of teaching assistant (TA) robots and the possible motivations that impact the users' intention to use (IU) the robots. Design/methodology/approach -In light of the rapid development of and attempts at understanding interactions with social robots, including TA robots, this study uses structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis. Findings -The results indicated that perceived usefulness was the most crucial factor determining the users' IU for TA robots. In addition, the relationships of the original technology acceptance model were confirmed. The study findings demonstrated the crucial importance of perceived enjoyment and service quality. Originality/value -Although the role of TA robots has gained user attention, few investigations have been conducted to explain how IU is formed. The current study can thus act as the foundation for exploring the acceptance process in the context of TA robots.

show abstract

Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model

Cited by 218 publications

References 48 publications

A Preliminary Introduction to the OTAM: Exploring Users’ Perceptions of their on-going Interaction with Adopted Technologies

A Preliminary Introduction to the OTAM: Exploring Users’ Perceptions of their on-going Interaction with Adopted Technologies

Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept

The adoption of teaching assistant robots: a technology acceptance model approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About