2016
DOI: 10.1108/ijrdm-07-2015-0103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding store to web: migration and synergy effects in multi-channel retailing

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the topic of multi-channel retailing. Specifically, the research intends to determine if and to what extent the opening of physical stores by a former web-only retailer reduces or extends overall retail sales, and whether such effects tend to change over time. Empirical analysis focuses on data elaboration from a retailer who has passed from the initial mono-channel model (pure online), to a multi-channel one with the opening of stores. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What is a quick and simple solution to your dilemma has labelled you as a cross-channel shopper; one of the most challenging kind of consumers for retailers (Chou et al, 2016). Such apparent exploitation of retailers by switching between online and physical store channels has become commonplace (Fornari et al, 2016;Kalyanam and Tsay, 2013;Konuş, Verhoef, and Neslin, 2008), with such cross-channel behaviour typically perceived as intentional (Flavián, Gurrea, and Orús, 2019;Santos and Gonçalves, 2019;Schneider and Zielke, 2020). Although, as this example illustrates, cross channel switching may not always be an intentional behaviour, with some consumers forced to switch channels due to factors outside their control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is a quick and simple solution to your dilemma has labelled you as a cross-channel shopper; one of the most challenging kind of consumers for retailers (Chou et al, 2016). Such apparent exploitation of retailers by switching between online and physical store channels has become commonplace (Fornari et al, 2016;Kalyanam and Tsay, 2013;Konuş, Verhoef, and Neslin, 2008), with such cross-channel behaviour typically perceived as intentional (Flavián, Gurrea, and Orús, 2019;Santos and Gonçalves, 2019;Schneider and Zielke, 2020). Although, as this example illustrates, cross channel switching may not always be an intentional behaviour, with some consumers forced to switch channels due to factors outside their control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the introduction of these new technologies at physical points of sale may solve several emerging problems in traditional retailing such as a crowded retail environment, limited opening hours, temporary non-availability of a sales assistant, and the slow speed of reply and monetary transactions (payments). For these reasons, the number of consumers shopping online (e-shopping), through mobile technology (m-shopping) or through multiple technologies (omni-channel shopping) is rapidly increasing, which in turn intensifies competition with the traditional offline channel (Dennis et al, 2016;Fornari et al, 2016;Picot-Coupey et al, 2016). Therefore, from the consumer point of view, benefits emerging from the introduction of technology-based innovations at the point of sale include access to a wider offer, reduction of queues and waiting time, access to customised services, more efficient delivery, rewards for loyal consumers, reinforcement of trust with sellers, and more satisfying shopping experiences.…”
Section: Drivers Of Innovation In Retailingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In multichannel retailing, diverse channels are managed so as to offer shoppers a seamless experience across all channels. In omnichannel retailing, neither the customer nor the retailer distinguishes between channels any longer could also push webrooming (Fornari et al 2016). The better service quality offered by physical stores also acts as an antecedent to webrooming behaviours (Chiu et al 2011).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%