2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding Technological Solutions for Safety Improvement at Level Crossings: A Functional Specification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drivers sometimes are trying to weave around the close half-barriers at LCs. These types of accidents are the second most common after over speeding when approaching the LC [15], [16]. To prevent this type of accident, two half-barriers can be replaced by two full barriers or four half-barriers.…”
Section: Lc Accidents and Types Of Users Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drivers sometimes are trying to weave around the close half-barriers at LCs. These types of accidents are the second most common after over speeding when approaching the LC [15], [16]. To prevent this type of accident, two half-barriers can be replaced by two full barriers or four half-barriers.…”
Section: Lc Accidents and Types Of Users Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LC with a passive warning system has higher accident rates, but a LC with barriers and flashing light has a lower accident rate [4], [18]- [20]. The major reasons of accidents at LCs are distraction of car drivers or pedestrians, impatience, and the high speed of vehicles approaching LCs [15]. These users' behaviour is the reason for accidents in 95% of cases [7].…”
Section: Lc Accidents and Types Of Users Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, these problems necessitate a search for a cheap and safe solution that covers all level crossing systems related to level crossings. Bahloul et al [2] have suggested some technological solutions to improve safety at level crossings. They studied on the PANsafer project whose purpose is to improve safety at level crossings and carried out statistical analysis using accident/incident databases and studied on the human behaviour to determine potential risky situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 35 m/s 2 at 40 km/h and it takes about 40 seconds. Besides at 60 km/h, vibration values change between about 20 m/s 2 and 140 m/s 2 and it takes about 22 seconds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has identified the principal technical challenges related to level crossings in developing high-speed rail systems so as to facilitate the planning, development, construction, and operation of new systems. The purpose of An availability evaluation of the Moroccan level crossing system using Fault Tree modelling and importance measures 3 3 the work discussed in (Bahloul, Defossez, Ghazel, & Simon, 2012) was to improve safety of level crossing by analyzing accident/incident data bases and integrating human behaviour using UML diagrams, in order to bring out the main functions of level crossing protection system which are concerned by different actors of the project. In (M.EASA, 1994), the authors presented a probabilistic method that accounted for the variations of the component design variables of sight distance at level crossings when computing system reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%