2015
DOI: 10.9734/ajaees/2015/13844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding Value at the Farm: The Case of Smallholder Potato Farmers in the Highlands of Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
13
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because, all other things been equal, the more a farmer produces, the more the surplus for value addition. Sebatta et al (2015) obtained similar result for smallholder potato farmers in the highlands of Uganda. Furthermore, membership of association, extension visit and access to credit directly determine the level of SWP value addition.…”
Section: Determinants Of Sweet Potato Value Addition Decision and Levsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because, all other things been equal, the more a farmer produces, the more the surplus for value addition. Sebatta et al (2015) obtained similar result for smallholder potato farmers in the highlands of Uganda. Furthermore, membership of association, extension visit and access to credit directly determine the level of SWP value addition.…”
Section: Determinants Of Sweet Potato Value Addition Decision and Levsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Also, their involvement in SWP value addition is influenced by household size, total quantity produced, credit access, land size of the respondents, distance to the market and group membership. The study by Sebatta et al (2015) showed that the quantity harvested by farmers influenced their decision to add value to ware potato while access to extension services significantly and positively influenced value addition to seed potato. In Nigeria, researchers: Bergh et al (2012) and Omoare et al (2015) studied the various SWP value adding techniques farmers were involved in.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to farmers cultivating more farmland than they can manage; thus, leading to inefficiency in production and consequently affecting their profitability. This finding is contrary to a priori expectation but similar to the results of Sebatta et al (2015) who found that cultivating larger farmland leads to lower profitability levels. Similarly, labour input was negative (-0.0086) and in influencing the profitability level of Irish potato farming.…”
Section: Determinants Of Profitability Level Of Irish Potato Farmingsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Similarly, years of formal education and cooperative membership are expected to increase the probability of being highly profitable due to ability to understand and adopt innovation and exposure to knowledge of improved farm practices ( Tolno et al, 2016). Larger household size and farm size may increase the probability of being highly profitable due to more family labour availability and economies of scale, respectively but this is not conclusive in the literature (Sebatta et al 2015;Okoye et al, 2008). Notable efforts are on-going to improve Irish potato production by the Potato Research Centre, Kuru-Vom in Plateau State through seeds multiplication, training of farmers, Irish potato research, breeding and selection of new varieties that are capable of responding to improved cultural practices (Zemba et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because field days and workshops provide information, knowledge and skills that enable farmers to be aware and use the technology. Field days and workshops play a central role of providing support for institutional mechanisms designed to support the dissemination and diffusion of knowledge among farmers and demonstration of gains from new technologies [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: -3-strategies On How To Promote Effective Irish Potato Valumentioning
confidence: 99%