2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000249356.66720.9b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding Versatility to the Reconstruction of Intraoral Lining

Abstract: Reconstruction of a full-thickness cheek defect, especially one associated with a large lip and oral commissure defect, remains a challenge. After tumor excision, replacement of the oral mucosa is often necessary. The oral mucosa is a thin, pliable lining. Because the skin of the forearm is ideally suited for replacement of oral lining, being thin, pliable, and predominantly hairless, the radial forearm flap is the most frequently used soft-tissue flap for this purpose. In addition, the vascularity of the area… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Free flaps have been the primary option for post-oncological reconstruction of tissue defects in oral cancer patients because this tissue transfer provides an adequate donor tissue volume and adequate blood supply for most cases [21,22]. This free flap technique is not recommended in patients with vessel-depleted irradiated neck and in patients with a high ASA risk score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Free flaps have been the primary option for post-oncological reconstruction of tissue defects in oral cancer patients because this tissue transfer provides an adequate donor tissue volume and adequate blood supply for most cases [21,22]. This free flap technique is not recommended in patients with vessel-depleted irradiated neck and in patients with a high ASA risk score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The use of free flaps has been accepted as the primary option for reconstruction of soft or hard tissue defects in OSCC International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology patients after ablative oncological surgery. 16,17 However, a free flap is not recommended in patients with vessel-depleted operated or irradiated necks or patients with a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk score. Moreover, operative surgical time is longer compared with the submental flap, and consequently, hospital stay, costs and postoperative medical complications are usually higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, microvascular free flaps such as the radial forearm or the anterolateral thigh flaps have became the first choice and are still currently used with great success in reconstructing extensive perioral and intraoral defects 7,8,9,10 . However, these reconstruction techniques have advantages and disadvantages, the main ones being increased difficulty, they need trained personnel, microsurgical setup and are usually associated with an increased operative time and a longer hospital stay as well as functional and aesthetic problems in extensive defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the only satisfactory method of reconstruction of such extensive defects is the use of free vascular flaps such as radial forearm or anterolateral thigh flap, however. microvascular free flap techniques are technically complex 7,8,9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%