2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.107.044037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addition of tabulated equation of state and neutrino leakage support to illinoisgrmhd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While several numerical relativity simulations of magnetized binary neutron star mergers have been performed (e.g., Kiuchi et al 2014Kiuchi et al , 2022Dionysopoulou et al 2015;Palenzuela et al 2015Palenzuela et al , 2022Ciolfi et al 2017;Most et al 2019;Werneck et al 2023;Combi & Siegel 2023), turbulent magnetic field amplification during the collision (Price & Rosswog 2006;Kiuchi et al 2015;Aguilera-Miret et al 2020), which likely dominates the postmerger magnetic field geometry (Aguilera-Miret et al 2022), is not fully captured by current simulations (Kiuchi et al 2018). Although magnetic fields in the inspiral are not likely to strongly affect the orbital dynamics or gravitational-wave (GW) emission (Ioka & Taniguchi 2000;Zhu et al 2020), they could produce electromagnetic (EM) precursors prior to the merger (see, e.g., Hansen & Lyutikov 2001;Tsang et al 2012;Palenzuela et al 2013;Carrasco & Shibata 2020;Most & Philippov 2020, 2022aZhang 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several numerical relativity simulations of magnetized binary neutron star mergers have been performed (e.g., Kiuchi et al 2014Kiuchi et al , 2022Dionysopoulou et al 2015;Palenzuela et al 2015Palenzuela et al , 2022Ciolfi et al 2017;Most et al 2019;Werneck et al 2023;Combi & Siegel 2023), turbulent magnetic field amplification during the collision (Price & Rosswog 2006;Kiuchi et al 2015;Aguilera-Miret et al 2020), which likely dominates the postmerger magnetic field geometry (Aguilera-Miret et al 2022), is not fully captured by current simulations (Kiuchi et al 2018). Although magnetic fields in the inspiral are not likely to strongly affect the orbital dynamics or gravitational-wave (GW) emission (Ioka & Taniguchi 2000;Zhu et al 2020), they could produce electromagnetic (EM) precursors prior to the merger (see, e.g., Hansen & Lyutikov 2001;Tsang et al 2012;Palenzuela et al 2013;Carrasco & Shibata 2020;Most & Philippov 2020, 2022aZhang 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we divide our simulation of such events into two pieces. The first part is performed with the numerical relativity plus MHD code IllinoisGRMHD (Etienne et al 2015(Etienne et al , 2020Werneck et al 2023); the second part uses HARM3D+NUC (Murguia-Berthier et al 2021). A "hand-off" procedure assures consistency between the two in terms of the spacetime and the fluid properties (Lopez Armengol et al 2022).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooling rate  is the rate at which neutrinos (and antineutrinos) carry energy out of the gas. It is calculated from a local emission model and a leakage rate formalism (see Murguia-Berthier et al 2021;Werneck et al 2023, for details about the calculations of  and ).…”
Section: Physics Treated and Equations Solvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simplest and most inexpensive approach is the neutrino leakage scheme (see, e.g. Sekiguchi 2010, Deaton et al 2013, Palenzuela et al 2022a, Werneck et al 2023. This approximation seeks to account for changes in the electron fraction and in the energy losses due to the emission of neutrinos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%