2019
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines7040158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additional Evidence on Serological Correlates of Protection against Measles: An Observational Cohort Study among Once Vaccinated Children Exposed to Measles

Abstract: To assess correlates of protection against measles and against subclinical measles virus (MV) infection, we recruited once-vaccinated children from geographic regions associated with increased MV circulation and/or at schools with low vaccination coverage in the Netherlands. Paired blood samples were collected shortly after onset of the measles outbreak and after the outbreak. A questionnaire was used to document the likelihood of exposure to MV and occurrence of measles-like symptoms. All blood samples were t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expectation is that a concentration of the relevant biomarker (most commonly a level of antibody) can be found above which individuals are reasonably likely to be protected. This method has been applied to a number of diseases such as measles 4,5 and meningococcus 6 , typically by evaluating outbreaks of disease in which, fortuitously, pre-outbreak sera were available. The method has rarely been used in largescale vaccine trials because of the inconvenience and expense of collecting sera on all participants, but some COVID-19 vaccine trials are an exception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectation is that a concentration of the relevant biomarker (most commonly a level of antibody) can be found above which individuals are reasonably likely to be protected. This method has been applied to a number of diseases such as measles 4,5 and meningococcus 6 , typically by evaluating outbreaks of disease in which, fortuitously, pre-outbreak sera were available. The method has rarely been used in largescale vaccine trials because of the inconvenience and expense of collecting sera on all participants, but some COVID-19 vaccine trials are an exception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, severe adverse events are extremely rare, and we speculate that our results are not or are minimally affected by this omission. Lastly, there is no absolute association between being unprotected (seronegative) and not having protective antibody titers, since immune response to vaccines is complex and relies on different immunologic mechanisms which are not all explored by serology testing [27]. In fact, current data does not give conclusive evidence what level of antibodies should be considered protective for MMRV, even if it seems that high levels of circulating antibodies are important in protection against outbreaks [28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, it must be considered that our center was able to recruit only a part of all the adopted children arriving in Tuscany, as some parents may have consulted their primary care pediatrician or no one at all. Lastly, there is no absolute association between being unprotected and not having protective antibody titers, since immune response to vaccines is complex and relies on different immunologic mechanisms, which are not all explored by serology testing [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%