2006
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additional Performance of Nasal Bone in First Trimester Screening

Abstract: Our data show no additional performance of including presence or absence of fetal nasal bone in calculation of risk for fetal Down's syndrome between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation. Individual risk-orientated two-stage screening could be an alternative approach for integration of additional ultrasound markers in first trimester screening.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this prospective screening study demonstrate that at 11–13 weeks there is absence of the nasal bone in 1–2% of euploid fetuses, in 60% of fetuses with trisomy 21 and in about half of fetuses with trisomies 18 and 13. These findings are consistent with the results of previous screening studies11, 18–22.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The findings of this prospective screening study demonstrate that at 11–13 weeks there is absence of the nasal bone in 1–2% of euploid fetuses, in 60% of fetuses with trisomy 21 and in about half of fetuses with trisomies 18 and 13. These findings are consistent with the results of previous screening studies11, 18–22.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In fact, sensitivity was higher when that marker was excluded from the calculations. According to these authors, DR with and without NB evaluation was 77.8% and 94.4%, respectively for cut-off level of 1:300 [12]. Our data showed higher efficacy (DR of 84.5 and 93.0% respectively), with low rates of false-positive results (FPR of 10.7 and 2.0% respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, these results confirm the assessment that accurate examination of the nasal bone requires highly skilled sonographers and it is difficult to incorporate in the routine first trimester scan. Individual risk-oriented two-stage screening in specialist centers as proposed first by Nicolaides et al [16] and then by Kozlowski et al [10] should be performed instead. The prerequisite for the feasibility and implementation of the nasal bone length measurement is satisfactory qualification of an experienced sonographer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%