2012
DOI: 10.1504/wrstsd.2012.047688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additionality of public R&D funding for business R&D - a dynamic panel data analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the literature has started to consider temporal aspects of R&D subsidies, and it confirms persistence in grant distribution (Bloch and Graversen, 2008;Gonzalez and Pazo, 2008). Persistence might arise due to several reasons.…”
Section: Prior Studiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…More recently, the literature has started to consider temporal aspects of R&D subsidies, and it confirms persistence in grant distribution (Bloch and Graversen, 2008;Gonzalez and Pazo, 2008). Persistence might arise due to several reasons.…”
Section: Prior Studiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…() on the later period does find additionality, suggests that the effectiveness of this policy tool has improved over time. In a further dynamic panel data regression analysis, Bloch and Graversen () obtain additionality effects of public R&D funding for a sample of Danish firms. For the business enterprise sector of 21 OECD countries, Falk () does not find a significant effect in dynamic panel data models.…”
Section: Public Policies In Support Of Private Randd Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the main contributions that describe the history of subsidies to firms, it is worth mentioning Aschhoff (), Duguet (), Bloch and Graversen (), Hussinger () and González and Pazó (). There is pervasive evidence in the existing literature to indicate that the subsidies granted to a firm are relatively persistent over time, so that a firm whose R&D activity was subsidised in the past is more likely to be subsidised again.…”
Section: Some Key Issues In the Relationship Between Public Randd Subsimentioning
confidence: 99%