2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0118(200001)33:1<44::aid-jgt5>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive and hereditary properties of graphs are uniquely factorizable into irreducible factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7], Mihók gave a remarkably general construction of uniquely partitionable graphs, and used this to produce a factorisation for the wider class of properties that are additive and induced-hereditary. This was claimed to be unique using the same argument as in [8]. We generalise his construction, and our own results (Theorems 4.9, 5.2 and 5.3, respectively) to prove that this factorisation is in fact unique.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In [7], Mihók gave a remarkably general construction of uniquely partitionable graphs, and used this to produce a factorisation for the wider class of properties that are additive and induced-hereditary. This was claimed to be unique using the same argument as in [8]. We generalise his construction, and our own results (Theorems 4.9, 5.2 and 5.3, respectively) to prove that this factorisation is in fact unique.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We note that unique factorisation was settled completely in [6] for a significant class of additive hereditary properties, the proof depending on the structure of those properties (and in the spirit of the proof we give here). It is possible to use the structure of the factorisation presented in [8] to show that any factorisation with exactly dc(P) additive hereditary factors must be the one constructed in that article (a similar proof is possible for the factorisation of [7]); the appeal of the proofs of uniqueness given here is that they are independent of the structure of the factors of P. Thus, they depend only on the more elementary aspects of [8] and [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is just (D ∩ P)-recognition; if D and P are both additive induced-hereditary, then so is D ∩ P, with F (D ∩ P) = min ≤ (F (D) ∪ F (P)). We leave it as an open question, for reducible P, to determine when D ∩P is also reducible; Mihók's characterisations [19,20] of reducibility may prove useful.…”
Section: New Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%