2022
DOI: 10.1109/ojnano.2022.3224229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive Manufacturing for Nano-Feature Applications: Electrohydrodynamic Printing as a Next-Generation Enabling Technology

Abstract: Regardless of the technology, additive or subtractive, the miniaturization trend is constantly pushing for smaller resolutions. The rise of global challenges in material availability, fabrication in three dimensions (3D), design flexibility and rapid prototyping have pushed additive manufacturing (AM) into the spotlight. Addressing the miniaturization trend, AM has already successfully answered the challenges for microscale 3D fabrication. However, fabricating nano-resolution still presents a challenge. In thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerosol jet printing 0.7-2500 10-10 3 0.01-6 6 Non-contact [28][29][30] Dispenser/Extruder printing 10-10 6 50-10 3 10-200 0.6 Non-contact [31][32][33] EHD inkjet 1-10 4 0.1-0.7 0.001-0.1 Slow Non-contact [21,[34][35][36][37] Flexo printing 10-500 30-80 0.17-8 5-180 Contact [38] Gravure offset 500-50 000 5-20 0.8-8 1-10 Contact [39] Gravure printing 100-1100 50-200 0.02-12 0.5-18 Contact [38,40,41] Inkjet (CJC, DOD) 2-100 30-50 0.1-20 0.02-5 Non-contact [38,42] Laser induced forward transfer (LIFT) -0.3-10 0.1-1 Slow Non-contact [43][44][45][46] Nanoimprint -0.005-0.1 0.1-1 ≤15 Contact [47][48][49] Offset printing 200-500 20-50 0.6-2 Fast Contact [38] Reverse offset 1-5 1-10 0.05-1 0.01-3 Contact [50][51][52][53] Screen printing 500-5000 30-100 3-30 0.6-100 Contact [38,54,55] trodes to sensors, where additive and printing technologies stand out with manifold advantages. A special feature of these technologies is their great flexibility in the choice of materials.…”
Section: Substrate Interaction Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosol jet printing 0.7-2500 10-10 3 0.01-6 6 Non-contact [28][29][30] Dispenser/Extruder printing 10-10 6 50-10 3 10-200 0.6 Non-contact [31][32][33] EHD inkjet 1-10 4 0.1-0.7 0.001-0.1 Slow Non-contact [21,[34][35][36][37] Flexo printing 10-500 30-80 0.17-8 5-180 Contact [38] Gravure offset 500-50 000 5-20 0.8-8 1-10 Contact [39] Gravure printing 100-1100 50-200 0.02-12 0.5-18 Contact [38,40,41] Inkjet (CJC, DOD) 2-100 30-50 0.1-20 0.02-5 Non-contact [38,42] Laser induced forward transfer (LIFT) -0.3-10 0.1-1 Slow Non-contact [43][44][45][46] Nanoimprint -0.005-0.1 0.1-1 ≤15 Contact [47][48][49] Offset printing 200-500 20-50 0.6-2 Fast Contact [38] Reverse offset 1-5 1-10 0.05-1 0.01-3 Contact [50][51][52][53] Screen printing 500-5000 30-100 3-30 0.6-100 Contact [38,54,55] trodes to sensors, where additive and printing technologies stand out with manifold advantages. A special feature of these technologies is their great flexibility in the choice of materials.…”
Section: Substrate Interaction Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-jet printing technology uses an applied electric field to “pull” the droplet out of the nozzle. It is compatible with different solutions in a more extensive viscosity range (1–10,000 cPs) and can generate droplets much smaller than the nozzle diameter due to the formation of droplets at the tip of the Taylor cone, thus enabling the printing of high-resolution structures at the micro or even nanoscale 23 . By using an electro fluidic nozzle to prepare microelectronics, Koei et al successfully printed electrodes with a minimum line width of 15 m on polyimide films 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%