2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive manufacturing of custom orthoses and prostheses—A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
161
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
161
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the materials used for AM polymers have become a main center of interest for a wide range of applications, in addition to metals [16] and ceramics [17]. Versatility and synthetic adaptability have made polymers the most used for AM processes [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) or so-called fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most popular AM processes due to its simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the materials used for AM polymers have become a main center of interest for a wide range of applications, in addition to metals [16] and ceramics [17]. Versatility and synthetic adaptability have made polymers the most used for AM processes [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) or so-called fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most popular AM processes due to its simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have since produced three more prostheses using the same method and have reported high levels of patient satisfaction and a reduced cycle time compared to traditional moulding methods, with good correspondence between prosthetic and soft tissue geometries. A comprehensive review of the use of AM for production of orthoses and prostheses was recently published by Chen et al [100], in which the authors discuss the use of XCT for the purpose of data capture among other data capture technologies. The authors in the case conclude the usefulness of AM in orthotic and prosthetic production, but note a lack of an appropriate clinical and design interface, uneconomic throughput and material cost, and material strength as the current primary barriers to increased adoption.…”
Section: Use For Endoprosthetics and Orthoticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the use of XCT and AM in production of endoprosthetics and orthotics, it should be noted that while XCT represents an interesting solution for data capture of internal patient geometry for endoprosthetic production, orthotic structures are more commonly produced in reference to data captured by optical scanning methods, so as to remove the radiation dose to the patient [100]. As orthotic devices do not usually require internal information and are produced to fit a patient's external geometry, this approach is generally adequate.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, such method is typically applied for anatomical portions which are easy to acquire because of the absence of occlusion issues (e.g., leg, arm, forearm, and face, excluding hands and fingers) [9, 12]. High levels of customization can be achieved by following a reverse engineering approach, usually consisting of three main stages [13, 14], which are critically analyzed in [2]: (1) scanning of anatomical parts, (2) processing of the acquired geometry using CAD software, and (3) creation of the device using additive manufacturing technologies. In literature, there are a few studies which analyze the whole hand orthosis realization process [15, 16]; others concentrate on specific stages, taking anatomy acquisition as provided by suitable systems [1719].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%