2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive manufacturing of glass: CO2-Laser glass deposition printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To accommodate the needs for nanotechnology various chemical deposition [ 13 , 14 ] or wet etching [ 15 , 16 ] techniques were employed. At the same time, direct [ 17 , 18 ] and indirect [ 19 , 20 ] additive 3D manufacturing of glass was demonstrated. However, in all of the highlighted processes, severe drawbacks and compromises are limiting their applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accommodate the needs for nanotechnology various chemical deposition [ 13 , 14 ] or wet etching [ 15 , 16 ] techniques were employed. At the same time, direct [ 17 , 18 ] and indirect [ 19 , 20 ] additive 3D manufacturing of glass was demonstrated. However, in all of the highlighted processes, severe drawbacks and compromises are limiting their applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach of SfC [14] we represent the solution space of our shape reconstruction as a height field h ∈ R n×n over the flat base substrate of known thickness d. To simulate the result-Figure 2. Schematic sketch of in-situ feedback during production: compared to the usual setup [37], this includes only two additional components: a light source above and a camera below the substrate to generate and capture caustic images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prior can be hand-crafted [14] or learned from data as in this work. This is motivated by the fact that the generating process we wish to consider here is 3D printing by laser glass deposition [37], which invalidates very small rapidly changing structures like in the reconstruction of Fig. 3.…”
Section: Underdeterminism Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has gained particular interest owing to its advantages of material saving, high production efficiency, and low cost [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In recent decades, with the rapid development of laser AM technology, the range of materials that can be processed has developed from metals [7,8], ceramics [9,10], and polymers [11,12] to the current transparent materials such as glass [13][14][15][16]. It is worth noting that its process parameters vary with the performance, application, and material of the product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%