2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive manufacturing-oriented concurrent robust topology optimization considering size control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A disadvantage is that this technique needs expert opinions to select the level cut or membership level into RBTO. From the literature review, RBTO needed more choices for alleviating the complexity in analysis in both TO and UQ, especially for a new edge of additive manufacturing (AM) [43,44]. At present, TO design can reach the production phase with AM technology, but uncertainties from manufacturing factors, such as random defects, voids [44], local damage [41], etc., must be included in the design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A disadvantage is that this technique needs expert opinions to select the level cut or membership level into RBTO. From the literature review, RBTO needed more choices for alleviating the complexity in analysis in both TO and UQ, especially for a new edge of additive manufacturing (AM) [43,44]. At present, TO design can reach the production phase with AM technology, but uncertainties from manufacturing factors, such as random defects, voids [44], local damage [41], etc., must be included in the design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature review, RBTO needed more choices for alleviating the complexity in analysis in both TO and UQ, especially for a new edge of additive manufacturing (AM) [43,44]. At present, TO design can reach the production phase with AM technology, but uncertainties from manufacturing factors, such as random defects, voids [44], local damage [41], etc., must be included in the design. Local damage failure and a robust worst-case approach bring fail-safe topology optimization (FSTO) [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%